Difference between revisions of "Talk:X-Form"
(Talking on a talk page.) |
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (response) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The names X-Wing and Y-Wing can't possibly be canon. Are they? | The names X-Wing and Y-Wing can't possibly be canon. Are they? | ||
--[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 14:46, 3 September 2008 (CEST) | --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 14:46, 3 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :See page 85 in the SC2 PC manual (or page 36 in the 3DO manual). I don't know if it appears anywhere else in the canon, such as the code or dialogue (though I'm pretty sure it's not in the dialogue). --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 21:00, 3 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 3 September 2008
If we include strategies here, then this should include a notice on using the Y-form to accelerate into a charge, then coasting in on the X-form, leaving enough time to recover battery.
Also, is it worth pointing out that X-form vs Ilwrath, though a slugfest slanted against the X-form, still has a good strategy and a bad strategy?
That is, a good strategy is for the X-form to ram the Ilwrath with lasers blazing, then use a touch of thrust coming off the bounce to get a good, medium range while moving away from the Ilwrath, yet tempting the Ilwrath to continue its charge. Ideally, the Ilwrath will have to traverse the 'hot spot' at a low relative velocity.
Yes, severe damage will be taken, but it comes out better than the naive 'charge' strategy. - Death 999 13:48, 22 Dec 2005 (EST)
The names X-Wing and Y-Wing can't possibly be canon. Are they?
--Shiver 14:46, 3 September 2008 (CEST)
- See page 85 in the SC2 PC manual (or page 36 in the 3DO manual). I don't know if it appears anywhere else in the canon, such as the code or dialogue (though I'm pretty sure it's not in the dialogue). --Fyzixfighter 21:00, 3 September 2008 (CEST)