<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JudgeDeadd</id>
	<title>Ultronomicon - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JudgeDeadd"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Special:Contributions/JudgeDeadd"/>
	<updated>2026-04-23T01:49:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/index.php?title=Talk:IRC_chats_with_Toys_For_Bob&amp;diff=24017</id>
		<title>Talk:IRC chats with Toys For Bob</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/index.php?title=Talk:IRC_chats_with_Toys_For_Bob&amp;diff=24017"/>
		<updated>2010-04-20T16:47:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JudgeDeadd: /* Question list */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Am I missing a meaning of the word &amp;quot;protocol&amp;quot; here?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
wasnt a certain chris present at the 2003 tfb chat?&lt;br /&gt;
dont know his full name, so i&#039;ll not add him to the list myself&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== TFB? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must have missed the explanation of TFB. Could someone point it out? —[[User:67.23.31.167|67.23.31.167]] 01:21, 5 September 2006 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Toys for Bob]] &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 01:34, 14 September 2006 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Title change ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone objects to changing the title to &amp;quot;IRC chats with Toys for Bob&amp;quot;? &amp;quot;Chat protocols&amp;quot; sounds weird. Plus, I don&#039;t like abbreviations in titles. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 17:16, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Umm, isn&#039;t IRC an abbreviation? And &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; (internet relay chat) and the redundant &amp;quot;chats&amp;quot; in the title are a classic redundancy ;). But seriously, I can&#039;t say which is better - I&#039;m not online-culture savvy enough to know the correct/usual way to refer to these type of things. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 19:16, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m not really that sure if &amp;quot;IRC chats&amp;quot; is that redundant. &amp;quot;Internet relay chats&amp;quot; sounds forced, and &amp;quot;IRCs&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; doesn&#039;t convey the same meaning (&amp;quot;IRC with Toys for Bob&amp;quot;). It&#039;s not like &amp;quot;LCD display&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::And IRC is an abbreviation, yes, but it&#039;s different, since it&#039;s the official name (like in &amp;quot;laser&amp;quot;), not just a name simplification - or I think so.&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, look at the two sections above to see some people&#039;s problems with &amp;quot;TFB&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;protocols&amp;quot;. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 20:06, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, another one of my pet peeves - &amp;quot;LCD display&amp;quot;;) - however LED display is alright. How about &amp;quot;IRC transcripts with Toys for Bob&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;IRC communications with Toys for Bob&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;IRC events...&amp;quot;? Honestly I don&#039;t mind the IRC in the title - I think what you&#039;re getting at is that it&#039;s an acronym that has passed into the vernacular such that most people know what it is but don&#039;t know exactly what the letters stands for, whereas TFB is less well know - which assessment I agree with. &amp;quot;Laser&amp;quot; isn&#039;t the greatest comparison as it has been around so long that we don&#039;t capitalize any of the letters (like &amp;quot;scuba&amp;quot;), and we&#039;ve even made it into a verb (&amp;quot;to lase&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lasing&amp;quot;) - I could go on about &amp;quot;laser&amp;quot; (happens when you&#039;ve worked on them for a few years), but I think I&#039;ll quit before I get too far afield the original topic. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 20:54, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, about the redundancy of &amp;quot;IRC chat&amp;quot; - forgot to mention - actually &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; refers to &amp;quot;chatting&amp;quot; in general, while the second &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; means a singular &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; (the Orz race in general, and a singular *finger*). So &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; is the means of communications, like &amp;quot;telephone&amp;quot; and the second &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; is referring to a singular use of this means of communication (like in &amp;quot;telephone chat&amp;quot;). [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 21:35, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question list ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would anyone object if I dove into the chat protocols and created a wiki page which would just list all the questions and the TFB&#039;s answers to them, for easy reading? [[User:JudgeDeadd|JudgeDeadd]] 07:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no reason why all that text shouldn&#039;t be put on this page as well as linked to . . . is there a reason? About the broken link to the 1998 chatlog, I&#039;ll ask the PNF team if they still have that and where. A lot of stuff hasn&#039;t been sorted since the move to the new server. --[[User:Zeracles|Zeracles]] 09:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No reason, really, I could put it on this page as well. I was mainly asking about whether it would be considered useful if I made such a practical list. [[User:JudgeDeadd|JudgeDeadd]] 16:47, 20 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JudgeDeadd</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/index.php?title=Talk:IRC_chats_with_Toys_For_Bob&amp;diff=24012</id>
		<title>Talk:IRC chats with Toys For Bob</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/index.php?title=Talk:IRC_chats_with_Toys_For_Bob&amp;diff=24012"/>
		<updated>2010-04-18T07:34:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JudgeDeadd: /* Question list */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Am I missing a meaning of the word &amp;quot;protocol&amp;quot; here?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
wasnt a certain chris present at the 2003 tfb chat?&lt;br /&gt;
dont know his full name, so i&#039;ll not add him to the list myself&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== TFB? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must have missed the explanation of TFB. Could someone point it out? —[[User:67.23.31.167|67.23.31.167]] 01:21, 5 September 2006 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Toys for Bob]] &amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 01:34, 14 September 2006 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Title change ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone objects to changing the title to &amp;quot;IRC chats with Toys for Bob&amp;quot;? &amp;quot;Chat protocols&amp;quot; sounds weird. Plus, I don&#039;t like abbreviations in titles. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 17:16, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Umm, isn&#039;t IRC an abbreviation? And &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; (internet relay chat) and the redundant &amp;quot;chats&amp;quot; in the title are a classic redundancy ;). But seriously, I can&#039;t say which is better - I&#039;m not online-culture savvy enough to know the correct/usual way to refer to these type of things. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 19:16, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I&#039;m not really that sure if &amp;quot;IRC chats&amp;quot; is that redundant. &amp;quot;Internet relay chats&amp;quot; sounds forced, and &amp;quot;IRCs&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; doesn&#039;t convey the same meaning (&amp;quot;IRC with Toys for Bob&amp;quot;). It&#039;s not like &amp;quot;LCD display&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::And IRC is an abbreviation, yes, but it&#039;s different, since it&#039;s the official name (like in &amp;quot;laser&amp;quot;), not just a name simplification - or I think so.&lt;br /&gt;
::Plus, look at the two sections above to see some people&#039;s problems with &amp;quot;TFB&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;protocols&amp;quot;. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 20:06, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, another one of my pet peeves - &amp;quot;LCD display&amp;quot;;) - however LED display is alright. How about &amp;quot;IRC transcripts with Toys for Bob&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;IRC communications with Toys for Bob&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;IRC events...&amp;quot;? Honestly I don&#039;t mind the IRC in the title - I think what you&#039;re getting at is that it&#039;s an acronym that has passed into the vernacular such that most people know what it is but don&#039;t know exactly what the letters stands for, whereas TFB is less well know - which assessment I agree with. &amp;quot;Laser&amp;quot; isn&#039;t the greatest comparison as it has been around so long that we don&#039;t capitalize any of the letters (like &amp;quot;scuba&amp;quot;), and we&#039;ve even made it into a verb (&amp;quot;to lase&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lasing&amp;quot;) - I could go on about &amp;quot;laser&amp;quot; (happens when you&#039;ve worked on them for a few years), but I think I&#039;ll quit before I get too far afield the original topic. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 20:54, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, about the redundancy of &amp;quot;IRC chat&amp;quot; - forgot to mention - actually &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; refers to &amp;quot;chatting&amp;quot; in general, while the second &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; means a singular &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; (the Orz race in general, and a singular *finger*). So &amp;quot;IRC&amp;quot; is the means of communications, like &amp;quot;telephone&amp;quot; and the second &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; is referring to a singular use of this means of communication (like in &amp;quot;telephone chat&amp;quot;). [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 21:35, 16 June 2007 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question list ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would anyone object if I dove into the chat protocols and created a wiki page which would just list all the questions and the TFB&#039;s answers to them, for easy reading? [[User:JudgeDeadd|JudgeDeadd]] 07:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JudgeDeadd</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>