Talk:Avatar - Revision history

Shiver at 06:51, 24 September 2013

2013-09-24T06:51:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 24 September 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)		:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)


			Fourshade: I've removed most of your recent work on this page's Tactical Overview. 1) Chmmr vs Kohr-Ah and Chmmr vs Androsynth are particular match-ups that do not need to be covered in an overview, and doing so clogs up the page. 2) Chmmr is indeed not very good against the Sa-Matra, and the page doesn't need a paragraph saying as much. Effort toward improving the ship pages is nonetheless appreciated. Feel free to contest the changes here if you wish. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] ([[User talk:Shiver\|talk]]) 08:51, 24 September 2013 (CEST)

2010-11-21T22:02:07Z

Reverted edits by 188.143.232.39 (Talk) to last revision by Fyzixfighter

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 21 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)		:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)

	~~== thanks for the postEromynorFlell ==~~

	~~Thank you, I have recently been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far.~~

2010-11-21T18:43:15Z

thanks for the postEromynorFlell: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 21 November 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)		:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)

			== thanks for the postEromynorFlell ==

			Thank you, I have recently been searching for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far.

2009-01-31T22:05:40Z

brief reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 31 January 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::I am not downloading Real Player to look at that, but I'll take your word that "Heavy X-Ray Laser" is canon. I didn't even play the 3DO version, so this is news to me. My reason for bringing this up is that I thought it was an ugly-sounding, non-canonical name. If anyone else dislikes the name, here's the place to speak up I guess. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:45, 30 January 2009 (CET)		::I am not downloading Real Player to look at that, but I'll take your word that "Heavy X-Ray Laser" is canon. I didn't even play the 3DO version, so this is news to me. My reason for bringing this up is that I thought it was an ugly-sounding, non-canonical name. If anyone else dislikes the name, here's the place to speak up I guess. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:45, 30 January 2009 (CET)

			:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)

2009-01-30T05:45:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 30 January 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [http://starcontrol.classicgaming.gamespy.com/3do/avatar.shtml]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET)		:I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [http://starcontrol.classicgaming.gamespy.com/3do/avatar.shtml]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET)

			::I am not downloading Real Player to look at that, but I'll take your word that "Heavy X-Ray Laser" is canon. I didn't even play the 3DO version, so this is news to me. My reason for bringing this up is that I thought it was an ugly-sounding, non-canonical name. If anyone else dislikes the name, here's the place to speak up I guess. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:45, 30 January 2009 (CET)

2009-01-29T07:42:07Z

reply - need more info about reasons for wanting to change it

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 29 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm thinking of changing "Heavy X-Ray Laser" to "Heavy Laser". Ultronomicon regulars, do you agree or disagree? --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 04:18, 29 January 2009 (CET)		I'm thinking of changing "Heavy X-Ray Laser" to "Heavy Laser". Ultronomicon regulars, do you agree or disagree? --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 04:18, 29 January 2009 (CET)

			:I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [http://starcontrol.classicgaming.gamespy.com/3do/avatar.shtml]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET)

2009-01-29T03:18:04Z

Suggesting a change.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 29 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~What is the rate of fire of one Chmmr satellite?~~ I ~~don~~'~~t see the answer here~~.		I'm thinking of changing "Heavy X-Ray Laser" to "Heavy Laser". Ultronomicon regulars, do you agree or disagree? --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 04:18, 29 January 2009 (CET)

	--[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 15:50, ~~1 September 2008~~ (~~CEST~~)

2008-09-01T13:50:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 1 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What is the rate of fire of one Chmmr satellite? I don't see the answer here.		What is the rate of fire of one Chmmr satellite? I don't see the answer here.

			--[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 15:50, 1 September 2008 (CEST)

2008-09-01T13:50:15Z

New page: What is the rate of fire of one Chmmr satellite? I don't see the answer here.

New page

What is the rate of fire of one Chmmr satellite? I don't see the answer here.