Talk:Blazer - Revision history

Fyzixfighter: my thoughts

2008-02-05T15:59:20Z

my thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 5 February 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Do we really need this article? What makes the Blazer special among all primaries and secondaries? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 10:18, 3 February 2008 (CET)		Do we really need this article? What makes the Blazer special among all primaries and secondaries? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 10:18, 3 February 2008 (CET)

	You're right to question the existence of this article (though unfortunately this discussion won't be as interesting as [[Talk:Below]]), but while I don't think this article is absolutely essential, I don't see it doing any harm either. If anything makes Blazer special, it would be that it's not the sort of weapon you'd commonly find in other games, or one which is familiar to newcomers. For example, there's no point in having an article for laser or tractor beam - I don't see anyone typing either of these into this wiki's search box. So I don't have a problem with this article, but if anyone else does it could easily be merged into [[Guardian]] and I wouldn't really care. Your thoughts, Fyzix? --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 16:43, 5 February 2008 (CET)		:You're right to question the existence of this article (though unfortunately this discussion won't be as interesting as [[Talk:Below]]), but while I don't think this article is absolutely essential, I don't see it doing any harm either. If anything makes Blazer special, it would be that it's not the sort of weapon you'd commonly find in other games, or one which is familiar to newcomers. For example, there's no point in having an article for laser or tractor beam - I don't see anyone typing either of these into this wiki's search box. So I don't have a problem with this article, but if anyone else does it could easily be merged into [[Guardian]] and I wouldn't really care. Your thoughts, Fyzix? --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 16:43, 5 February 2008 (CET)

			::I agree that I think there really isn't a need to for this article. I can't think of any separate article we have for some of the more exotic weapons like DOGIs or limpets or Orz Marines. That said, there is some unique information here that isn't found in the [[Guardian]] page, so my advice, like Zeracles', would be to merge this page into that section, and change this into a redirect to [[Guardian#Secondary]]. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 16:59, 5 February 2008 (CET)

Zeracles: /* Keep? */ I would

2008-02-05T15:43:49Z

Keep?: I would

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 5 February 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Do we really need this article? What makes the Blazer special among all primaries and secondaries? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 10:18, 3 February 2008 (CET)		Do we really need this article? What makes the Blazer special among all primaries and secondaries? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 10:18, 3 February 2008 (CET)

			You're right to question the existence of this article (though unfortunately this discussion won't be as interesting as [[Talk:Below]]), but while I don't think this article is absolutely essential, I don't see it doing any harm either. If anything makes Blazer special, it would be that it's not the sort of weapon you'd commonly find in other games, or one which is familiar to newcomers. For example, there's no point in having an article for laser or tractor beam - I don't see anyone typing either of these into this wiki's search box. So I don't have a problem with this article, but if anyone else does it could easily be merged into [[Guardian]] and I wouldn't really care. Your thoughts, Fyzix? --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 16:43, 5 February 2008 (CET)

Valaggar: /* Keep? */

2008-02-03T09:18:00Z

Keep?

New page

== Keep? ==

Do we really need this article? What makes the Blazer special among all primaries and secondaries? [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 10:18, 3 February 2008 (CET)