Talk:Furnace - Revision history

Svdb: clarification

2005-02-02T22:36:32Z

clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 2 February 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)		:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)
			::We'll see. If it doesn't, I'll file a bug report. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 23:36, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)

	:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137\|130.58.225.137]]		:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137\|130.58.225.137]]

			::That was the idea. I was talking about an automatic redirect, not a reference. It doesn't hurt having one. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]]

130.58.225.137 at 15:45, 2 February 2005

2005-02-02T15:45:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 2 February 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)		:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)

			:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137\|130.58.225.137]]

Fadookie at 05:23, 14 January 2005

2005-01-14T05:23:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:23, 14 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think this should be a redirect to [[Mauler#Secondary]]. Opinions? -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 10:07, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)		I think this should be a redirect to [[Mauler#Secondary]]. Opinions? -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 10:07, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)

			:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)

Svdb: wiki link fixed

2005-01-13T09:09:37Z

wiki link fixed

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 13 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think this should be a redirect to [Mauler#Secondary]. Opinions? -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 10:07, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)		I think this should be a redirect to [[Mauler#Secondary]]. Opinions? -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 10:07, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)

Svdb: redirect it to [Mauler#Secondary]?

2005-01-13T09:07:39Z

redirect it to [Mauler#Secondary]?

New page

I think this should be a redirect to [Mauler#Secondary]. Opinions? -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 10:07, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 2 February 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)		:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)
			::We'll see. If it doesn't, I'll file a bug report. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 23:36, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)

	:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137\|130.58.225.137]]		:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137\|130.58.225.137]]

			::That was the idea. I was talking about an automatic redirect, not a reference. It doesn't hurt having one. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]]