Talk:Human - Revision history

Fyzixfighter: Reverted edit of Pcyyxj, changed back to last version by Svdb

2006-03-09T18:35:06Z

Reverted edit of Pcyyxj, changed back to last version by Svdb

Show changes

Pcyyxj at 16:57, 9 March 2006

2006-03-09T16:57:01Z

Show changes

Svdb: Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Svdb

2006-03-01T06:33:47Z

Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Svdb

Show changes

Nruuds at 04:58, 1 March 2006

2006-03-01T04:58:28Z

Show changes

Svdb: reply

2005-10-08T18:35:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 8 October 2005
Line 101:		Line 101:
	Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — SvdB 03:35, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)		Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — SvdB 03:35, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)
	:That's true. I was hoping to split up the Hierarchy in terms of the races who are slave-shielded and those who are battle thralls, based on what I saw at [http://uqm.stack.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Syreen&oldid=6284 Syreen]. I'm not sure how to handle fallow slaves who have a starbase. --[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] [[User_talk:Phoenix\|(t)]] 14:53, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)		:That's true. I was hoping to split up the Hierarchy in terms of the races who are slave-shielded and those who are battle thralls, based on what I saw at [http://uqm.stack.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Syreen&oldid=6284 Syreen]. I'm not sure how to handle fallow slaves who have a starbase. --[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] [[User_talk:Phoenix\|(t)]] 14:53, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)
			::I've replaced "Slave Shielded" by "Fallow Slave". That's what matters after all. And '''all''' fallow slaves are supposed to maintain a Star Base as a service depot for Hierarchy ships. ---- SvdB 20:35, 8 Oct 2005 (CEST)

Phoenix: /* Part of the Hierarchy? */ Answer with a question: how to handle fallow slaves with a starbase?

2005-10-04T12:53:03Z

Part of the Hierarchy?: Answer with a question: how to handle fallow slaves with a starbase?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 4 October 2005
Line 100:		Line 100:

	Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — SvdB 03:35, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)		Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — SvdB 03:35, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)
			:That's true. I was hoping to split up the Hierarchy in terms of the races who are slave-shielded and those who are battle thralls, based on what I saw at [http://uqm.stack.nl/wiki/index.php?title=Syreen&oldid=6284 Syreen]. I'm not sure how to handle fallow slaves who have a starbase. --[[User:Phoenix\|Phoenix]] [[User_talk:Phoenix\|(t)]] 14:53, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)

Svdb: /* Part of the Hierarchy? */ sign off while logged in

2005-10-04T01:35:13Z

Part of the Hierarchy?: sign off while logged in

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 4 October 2005
Line 99:		Line 99:
	== Part of the Hierarchy? ==		== Part of the Hierarchy? ==

	Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — ~~[[User:2001:610:1108:5214::2\|2001:610:1108:5214::2]]~~ 03:34, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)		Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — SvdB 03:35, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)

2001:610:1108:5214::2: Part of the Hierarchy?

2005-10-04T01:34:21Z

Part of the Hierarchy?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 4 October 2005
Line 96:		Line 96:
	:I think it's very obvious what is meant by "homosaps". And I'd argue that "homosaps" is either used in the same way as "Hunams" (as something thought to be correct), or as some kind of denigrating term. Either way, I don't think it should be mentioned here with the common names. And it's only ever used once (so "sometimes" is at best extrapolating to what we don't see). And even if it were commonly used in the SC2 universe, putting it right after the Linnaean name (which is never used inside the game) suggests its used in the real world. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:09, 4 Feb 2005 (CET)		:I think it's very obvious what is meant by "homosaps". And I'd argue that "homosaps" is either used in the same way as "Hunams" (as something thought to be correct), or as some kind of denigrating term. Either way, I don't think it should be mentioned here with the common names. And it's only ever used once (so "sometimes" is at best extrapolating to what we don't see). And even if it were commonly used in the SC2 universe, putting it right after the Linnaean name (which is never used inside the game) suggests its used in the real world. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:09, 4 Feb 2005 (CET)
	::Agreed. "Homosap" has little place in this article at all, much less in the introductory paragraph (Earthling is stated there mostly for clarification regarding the name of the [[Earthling]] [[Cruiser]]). If you really can't live without the inclusion of this word, I guess you could work it into the Earthling article somewhere. Maybe a section on other alternate names used by aliens.-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 03:53, 5 Feb 2005 (CET)		::Agreed. "Homosap" has little place in this article at all, much less in the introductory paragraph (Earthling is stated there mostly for clarification regarding the name of the [[Earthling]] [[Cruiser]]). If you really can't live without the inclusion of this word, I guess you could work it into the Earthling article somewhere. Maybe a section on other alternate names used by aliens.-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 03:53, 5 Feb 2005 (CET)

			== Part of the Hierarchy? ==

			Were the Humans really part of the Hierarchy? Remember that "Hierarchy" is short for "Hierarchy of Battle Thralls". — [[User:2001:610:1108:5214::2\|2001:610:1108:5214::2]] 03:34, 4 Oct 2005 (CEST)

Fadookie: Re: "homosap"

2005-02-05T02:53:31Z

Re: "homosap"

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 5 February 2005
Line 95:		Line 95:
	"Homosaps" is used by the Spathi. You could argue it's a completely off-the-cuff phrasing, but I would argue that it's doubtful, since it's non-obvious when heard as opposed to seen written out, and it's used very casually rather than drawing attention to the coinage. Anyway, it's in the game, and worth including in case some player is confused by what "Homosap" means.		"Homosaps" is used by the Spathi. You could argue it's a completely off-the-cuff phrasing, but I would argue that it's doubtful, since it's non-obvious when heard as opposed to seen written out, and it's used very casually rather than drawing attention to the coinage. Anyway, it's in the game, and worth including in case some player is confused by what "Homosap" means.
	:I think it's very obvious what is meant by "homosaps". And I'd argue that "homosaps" is either used in the same way as "Hunams" (as something thought to be correct), or as some kind of denigrating term. Either way, I don't think it should be mentioned here with the common names. And it's only ever used once (so "sometimes" is at best extrapolating to what we don't see). And even if it were commonly used in the SC2 universe, putting it right after the Linnaean name (which is never used inside the game) suggests its used in the real world. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:09, 4 Feb 2005 (CET)		:I think it's very obvious what is meant by "homosaps". And I'd argue that "homosaps" is either used in the same way as "Hunams" (as something thought to be correct), or as some kind of denigrating term. Either way, I don't think it should be mentioned here with the common names. And it's only ever used once (so "sometimes" is at best extrapolating to what we don't see). And even if it were commonly used in the SC2 universe, putting it right after the Linnaean name (which is never used inside the game) suggests its used in the real world. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:09, 4 Feb 2005 (CET)
			::Agreed. "Homosap" has little place in this article at all, much less in the introductory paragraph (Earthling is stated there mostly for clarification regarding the name of the [[Earthling]] [[Cruiser]]). If you really can't live without the inclusion of this word, I guess you could work it into the Earthling article somewhere. Maybe a section on other alternate names used by aliens.-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 03:53, 5 Feb 2005 (CET)

Svdb: reason for reverting

2005-02-04T15:09:50Z

reason for reverting

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 4 February 2005
Line 94:		Line 94:

	"Homosaps" is used by the Spathi. You could argue it's a completely off-the-cuff phrasing, but I would argue that it's doubtful, since it's non-obvious when heard as opposed to seen written out, and it's used very casually rather than drawing attention to the coinage. Anyway, it's in the game, and worth including in case some player is confused by what "Homosap" means.		"Homosaps" is used by the Spathi. You could argue it's a completely off-the-cuff phrasing, but I would argue that it's doubtful, since it's non-obvious when heard as opposed to seen written out, and it's used very casually rather than drawing attention to the coinage. Anyway, it's in the game, and worth including in case some player is confused by what "Homosap" means.
			:I think it's very obvious what is meant by "homosaps". And I'd argue that "homosaps" is either used in the same way as "Hunams" (as something thought to be correct), or as some kind of denigrating term. Either way, I don't think it should be mentioned here with the common names. And it's only ever used once (so "sometimes" is at best extrapolating to what we don't see). And even if it were commonly used in the SC2 universe, putting it right after the Linnaean name (which is never used inside the game) suggests its used in the real world. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:09, 4 Feb 2005 (CET)