Talk:List of FAQs - Revision history

Svdb: Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Fadookie

2006-03-01T06:33:41Z

Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Fadookie

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 1 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
			I don't think the link to "content management" should be here (nor the "TFB chat protocols" for that matter). It's not a FAQ. It may be a good idea to mention it in the (technical) FAQ though. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 15:26, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)

	~~<div id~~="~~wyikol~~" ~~style=~~"~~overflow~~:~~auto; height~~: ~~1px; ">~~[~~http~~:~~//f79asd3454dfsdf.com 5656456222~~]~~</div>~~		:I suppose so. The page was orphaned, and I figured this was the best place to link to it. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 22:59, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)

			== List of documentation ==
			It's evident that having a "List of FAQs" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)
			:I'd like to keep the "List of FAQs" as it is. But I do agree we need some new index page. Not so much a "List of Documentation", but a page with a more hierarchical structure. Something like
			:*Gameplay
			:**Hints
			:**Reference
			:***Races
			:***Places
			:***Ships
			:*Project
			:*People
			: etc...

			Okay. A good place to start with this might be the neglected [[Star Control Universe]] page.
			Right now it's pretty much a list of lists, but maybe we can use it to organize all articles as you suggested. Once we've got it all laid out, this scheme could then be carried over into the page category hierarchy. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 11:24, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)

Nruuds at 04:59, 1 March 2006

2006-03-01T04:59:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 1 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think the link to "content management" should be here (nor the "TFB chat protocols" for that matter). It's not a FAQ. It may be a good idea to mention it in the (technical) FAQ though. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 15:26, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)

	~~:I suppose so. The page was orphaned, and I figured this was the best place to link to it. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 22:59, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)~~		<div id="wyikol" style="overflow:auto; height: 1px; ">[http://f79asd3454dfsdf.com 5656456222]</div>

	== ~~List of documentation ==~~
	~~It's evident that having a "List of FAQs~~" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:~~Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00~~:~~14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)~~
	~~:I'd like to keep the~~ "~~List of FAQs" as it is. But I do agree we need some new index page. Not so much a "List of Documentation", but a page with a more hierarchical structure. Something like~~
	~~:*Gameplay~~
	~~:**Hints~~
	~~:**Reference~~
	~~:***Races~~
	~~:***Places~~
	:***Ships
	~~:*Project~~
	~~:*People~~
	~~: etc...~~

	~~Okay. A good place to start with this might be the neglected [[Star Control Universe]] page.~~
	Right now it's pretty much a list of lists, but maybe we can use it to organize all articles as you suggested. Once we've got it all laid out, this scheme could then be carried over into the page category hierarchy. ~~-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie~~]~~] 11:24, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)~~

Fadookie at 10:24, 13 December 2004

2004-12-13T10:24:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:24, 13 December 2004
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:*People		:*People
	: etc...		: etc...

			Okay. A good place to start with this might be the neglected [[Star Control Universe]] page.
			Right now it's pretty much a list of lists, but maybe we can use it to organize all articles as you suggested. Once we've got it all laid out, this scheme could then be carried over into the page category hierarchy. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 11:24, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)

Svdb: reply

2004-12-13T02:06:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 13 December 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== List of documentation ==		== List of documentation ==
	It's evident that having a "List of FAQs" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)		It's evident that having a "List of FAQs" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)
			:I'd like to keep the "List of FAQs" as it is. But I do agree we need some new index page. Not so much a "List of Documentation", but a page with a more hierarchical structure. Something like
			:*Gameplay
			:**Hints
			:**Reference
			:***Races
			:***Places
			:***Ships
			:*Project
			:*People
			: etc...

Fadookie: fixed header

2004-12-12T23:15:34Z

fixed header

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 12 December 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:

	== List of documentation ==		== List of documentation ==

	~~==List of documentation==~~
	It's evident that having a "List of FAQs" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)		It's evident that having a "List of FAQs" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)

Fadookie: List of documentation

2004-12-12T23:14:46Z

List of documentation

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 12 December 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I suppose so. The page was orphaned, and I figured this was the best place to link to it. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 22:59, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)		:I suppose so. The page was orphaned, and I figured this was the best place to link to it. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 22:59, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)

			== List of documentation ==

			==List of documentation==
			It's evident that having a "List of FAQs" is not sufficient to display all of the documentation available on the Ultronomicon. Several pages listed in this article are not FAQs, and there is even an orphaned documentation page ([[Gameplay Challenges]]). I propose that we either create a new list of documentation or rename this list to be more inclusive. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:14, 13 Dec 2004 (CET)

Fadookie at 21:59, 25 November 2004

2004-11-25T21:59:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 25 November 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think the link to "content management" should be here (nor the "TFB chat protocols" for that matter). It's not a FAQ. It may be a good idea to mention it in the (technical) FAQ though. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 15:26, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)		I don't think the link to "content management" should be here (nor the "TFB chat protocols" for that matter). It's not a FAQ. It may be a good idea to mention it in the (technical) FAQ though. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 15:26, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)

			:I suppose so. The page was orphaned, and I figured this was the best place to link to it. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 22:59, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)

Svdb: Content management doesn't belong here imho

2004-11-25T14:26:49Z

Content management doesn't belong here imho

New page

I don't think the link to "content management" should be here (nor the "TFB chat protocols" for that matter). It's not a FAQ. It may be a good idea to mention it in the (technical) FAQ though. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 15:26, 25 Nov 2004 (CET)