Talk:QuasiSpace Portal Spawner - Revision history

69.86.243.172 at 17:35, 11 June 2006

2006-06-11T17:35:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 11 June 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I find it's best to refer to it as the [[SIS]] or the [[Vindicator]]. Sometimes you can also get away with calling it The Flagship. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 10:45, 15 Oct 2004 (CEST)		I find it's best to refer to it as the [[SIS]] or the [[Vindicator]]. Sometimes you can also get away with calling it The Flagship. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 10:45, 15 Oct 2004 (CEST)

			If the Spawner supposedly uses a mysterious black box for power, how come it uses up 10 standard human fuel units? (Okay, I know it's really to prevent it from being TOO good of a device, but is there some sort of in-game explanation?)

Fadookie at 08:45, 15 October 2004

2004-10-15T08:45:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 15 October 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	If you're going to use the stupid neutral names, at least use them intelligently; "The Captain" is a description, not a name. It's "the human Captain", not "human captain The Captain". Also, it's spelled "Vessel", not "Vessal". And "The Precursor Vessel" is a stupid term anyway (the Sa-Matra and Mark II are both Precursor vessels); the best neutral term is probably Mark I, though Mark I is a term that follows something (i.e. Vindicator Mark I).		If you're going to use the stupid neutral names, at least use them intelligently; "The Captain" is a description, not a name. It's "the human Captain", not "human captain The Captain". Also, it's spelled "Vessel", not "Vessal". And "The Precursor Vessel" is a stupid term anyway (the Sa-Matra and Mark II are both Precursor vessels); the best neutral term is probably Mark I, though Mark I is a term that follows something (i.e. Vindicator Mark I).

			I find it's best to refer to it as the [[SIS]] or the [[Vindicator]]. Sometimes you can also get away with calling it The Flagship. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 10:45, 15 Oct 2004 (CEST)

130.58.238.233 at 00:33, 7 September 2004

2004-09-07T00:33:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:33, 7 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"this is probably one of the primary limiting factors leading to the relatively small size of the standard Arilou Skiff.", where does this come from? Why is this probable? There can be a million other reasons. "This may be" sounds better to me. [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:18, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST)		"this is probably one of the primary limiting factors leading to the relatively small size of the standard Arilou Skiff.", where does this come from? Why is this probable? There can be a million other reasons. "This may be" sounds better to me. [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:18, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST)

			If you're going to use the stupid neutral names, at least use them intelligently; "The Captain" is a description, not a name. It's "the human Captain", not "human captain The Captain". Also, it's spelled "Vessel", not "Vessal". And "The Precursor Vessel" is a stupid term anyway (the Sa-Matra and Mark II are both Precursor vessels); the best neutral term is probably Mark I, though Mark I is a term that follows something (i.e. Vindicator Mark I).

Svdb at 14:18, 5 September 2004

2004-09-05T14:18:59Z

New page

"this is probably one of the primary limiting factors leading to the relatively small size of the standard Arilou Skiff.", where does this come from? Why is this probable? There can be a million other reasons. "This may be" sounds better to me. [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 16:18, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST)