Talk:Race classification - Revision history

Fyzixfighter: Reverted edits by 95.133.110.45 (Talk) to last revision by Svdb

2011-05-10T13:25:20Z

Reverted edits by 95.133.110.45 (Talk) to last revision by Svdb

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 10 May 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:::: No, but feel free to make one. Please use the same name as on Wikipedia (see [[wikipedia:Template:Cleanup-rewrite]]; but don't copy the contents because of license differences), and add it to [[Ultronomicon:Templates]]. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 12:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)		:::: No, but feel free to make one. Please use the same name as on Wikipedia (see [[wikipedia:Template:Cleanup-rewrite]]; but don't copy the contents because of license differences), and add it to [[Ultronomicon:Templates]]. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 12:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

	~~== Zeer leerzaam ==~~

	~~moet controleren:)~~

95.133.110.45: /* Zeer leerzaam */ new section

2011-05-10T01:38:59Z

Zeer leerzaam: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 10 May 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:::: No, but feel free to make one. Please use the same name as on Wikipedia (see [[wikipedia:Template:Cleanup-rewrite]]; but don't copy the contents because of license differences), and add it to [[Ultronomicon:Templates]]. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 12:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)		:::: No, but feel free to make one. Please use the same name as on Wikipedia (see [[wikipedia:Template:Cleanup-rewrite]]; but don't copy the contents because of license differences), and add it to [[Ultronomicon:Templates]]. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 12:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

			== Zeer leerzaam ==

			moet controleren:)

Svdb: reply

2009-08-03T12:14:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 3 August 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:

	::: The parenthetical explanations which are right next to almost every species name on the friendly/neutral/hostile list is sloppy. Is there a marker of some sort for pages which are in obvious need of a rewrite? --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 00:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)		::: The parenthetical explanations which are right next to almost every species name on the friendly/neutral/hostile list is sloppy. Is there a marker of some sort for pages which are in obvious need of a rewrite? --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 00:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

			:::: No, but feel free to make one. Please use the same name as on Wikipedia (see [[wikipedia:Template:Cleanup-rewrite]]; but don't copy the contents because of license differences), and add it to [[Ultronomicon:Templates]]. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 12:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Shiver at 00:04, 3 August 2009

2009-08-03T00:04:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 3 August 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::I removed the physiology section. The rest may be salvageable in some form.		::I removed the physiology section. The rest may be salvageable in some form.
	::Btw, "doesn't contain enough interesting or useful content" in itself isn't enough reason to delete a page; if the topic itself is relevant enough, then extending may be more appropriate than deleting. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 00:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)		::Btw, "doesn't contain enough interesting or useful content" in itself isn't enough reason to delete a page; if the topic itself is relevant enough, then extending may be more appropriate than deleting. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 00:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

			::: The parenthetical explanations which are right next to almost every species name on the friendly/neutral/hostile list is sloppy. Is there a marker of some sort for pages which are in obvious need of a rewrite? --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 00:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Svdb: reply

2009-08-02T00:20:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 2 August 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:This page doesn't contain enough interesting or useful content. It should be deleted IMO. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 19:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)		:This page doesn't contain enough interesting or useful content. It should be deleted IMO. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 19:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

			::I removed the physiology section. The rest may be salvageable in some form.
			::Btw, "doesn't contain enough interesting or useful content" in itself isn't enough reason to delete a page; if the topic itself is relevant enough, then extending may be more appropriate than deleting. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 00:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Shiver at 19:49, 31 July 2009

2009-07-31T19:49:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:49, 31 July 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::''This'' page is not subjective, but it would be best if it were put in a table, indeed. "Alien psychology" should be deleted, agreed. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 19:45, 3 June 2007 (CEST)		::''This'' page is not subjective, but it would be best if it were put in a table, indeed. "Alien psychology" should be deleted, agreed. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 19:45, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

			:This page doesn't contain enough interesting or useful content. It should be deleted IMO. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 19:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Valaggar at 17:45, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T17:45:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 3 June 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:The thing that bothers me about this and the [[Alien psychology]] page is that it is too subjective in its choice of grouping and classification to those groups. I do agree that the "Attitudes" section could be modified into a useful form. IMO the other information could be useful if there was a canon taxonomy, or a much discussed consensus of what the taxonomy would be, though the organization of this information in such a way does get a bit crufty (obsession with minutia and all that). Perhaps better kept in the namespace of the user who finds this interesting. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 16:41, 2 June 2007 (CEST)		:The thing that bothers me about this and the [[Alien psychology]] page is that it is too subjective in its choice of grouping and classification to those groups. I do agree that the "Attitudes" section could be modified into a useful form. IMO the other information could be useful if there was a canon taxonomy, or a much discussed consensus of what the taxonomy would be, though the organization of this information in such a way does get a bit crufty (obsession with minutia and all that). Perhaps better kept in the namespace of the user who finds this interesting. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 16:41, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

	::''This'' page is not subjective, but it would be best if it were put in a table, indeed. "Alien psychology" should be deleted, agreed.		::''This'' page is not subjective, but it would be best if it were put in a table, indeed. "Alien psychology" should be deleted, agreed. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 19:45, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Valaggar at 17:45, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T17:45:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 3 June 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:The thing that bothers me about this and the [[Alien psychology]] page is that it is too subjective in its choice of grouping and classification to those groups. I do agree that the "Attitudes" section could be modified into a useful form. IMO the other information could be useful if there was a canon taxonomy, or a much discussed consensus of what the taxonomy would be, though the organization of this information in such a way does get a bit crufty (obsession with minutia and all that). Perhaps better kept in the namespace of the user who finds this interesting. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 16:41, 2 June 2007 (CEST)		:The thing that bothers me about this and the [[Alien psychology]] page is that it is too subjective in its choice of grouping and classification to those groups. I do agree that the "Attitudes" section could be modified into a useful form. IMO the other information could be useful if there was a canon taxonomy, or a much discussed consensus of what the taxonomy would be, though the organization of this information in such a way does get a bit crufty (obsession with minutia and all that). Perhaps better kept in the namespace of the user who finds this interesting. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 16:41, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

			::''This'' page is not subjective, but it would be best if it were put in a table, indeed. "Alien psychology" should be deleted, agreed.

Fyzixfighter: reply

2007-06-02T14:41:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 2 June 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I do see some potential for the "which side are aliens on" list, but maybe it works better as a table, listing the race name, their initial attitude, what attitudes they can take in the course of the game, and a comments column. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:13, 2 June 2007 (CEST)		I do see some potential for the "which side are aliens on" list, but maybe it works better as a table, listing the race name, their initial attitude, what attitudes they can take in the course of the game, and a comments column. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:13, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

			:The thing that bothers me about this and the [[Alien psychology]] page is that it is too subjective in its choice of grouping and classification to those groups. I do agree that the "Attitudes" section could be modified into a useful form. IMO the other information could be useful if there was a canon taxonomy, or a much discussed consensus of what the taxonomy would be, though the organization of this information in such a way does get a bit crufty (obsession with minutia and all that). Perhaps better kept in the namespace of the user who finds this interesting. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 16:41, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Svdb: what to make of this page

2007-06-02T14:13:07Z

what to make of this page

New page

I'm not sure what to make of this page; is there really a use for a page like this? Especially the morphology section; it's all rather vague, and would there ever be a use to go to a page of all humanoid aliens?

I do see some potential for the "which side are aliens on" list, but maybe it works better as a table, listing the race name, their initial attitude, what attitudes they can take in the course of the game, and a comments column. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 16:13, 2 June 2007 (CEST)