Talk:Rainbow World - Revision history

Keybounce: /* Clarification */

2006-05-12T04:53:56Z

Clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 12 May 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:
	I agree. Mixing in-story and out-of-story elemnts is not a good idea. But I do think both have their place in the Ultronomicon. I'd like it to be a reference of all things Star Control. So separate sections seems to be the way to go for me. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:33, 22 Feb 2005 (CET)		I agree. Mixing in-story and out-of-story elemnts is not a good idea. But I do think both have their place in the Ultronomicon. I'd like it to be a reference of all things Star Control. So separate sections seems to be the way to go for me. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:33, 22 Feb 2005 (CET)

			== Formation ==
	As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to. [[User:24.37.65.110\|24.37.65.110]]		As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to. [[User:24.37.65.110\|24.37.65.110]]
			: Simple -- they point to StarCon 3 :-). --[[User:Keybounce\|Keybounce]] 06:53, 12 May 2006 (CEST)

Svdb: Reverted edit of 206.116.77.45, changed back to last version by Svdb

2005-08-26T13:18:04Z

Reverted edit of 206.116.77.45, changed back to last version by Svdb

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)
-Hi all!
+== Clarification ==
-wickes furniture online:
-[http://www.online-shopping.wb.st/ wickes furniture online]
+"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."
-Best regarts, David Brown
+There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:

206.116.77.45: /* Clarification */

2005-08-26T12:46:34Z

Clarification

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)
-== Clarification ==
+Hi all!
+wickes furniture online:
-"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."
+[http://www.online-shopping.wb.st/ wickes furniture online]
-There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:
+Best regarts, David Brown

Svdb: Reverted edit of 67.65.34.149, changed back to last version by Svdb

2005-08-26T00:15:03Z

Reverted edit of 67.65.34.149, changed back to last version by Svdb

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 26 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)		Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)

	[~~http~~:~~//www~~.~~smartsearch~~.~~name/fxclub/index~~.~~html Forextrading~~]		== Clarification ==

			"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."
			There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:
			# orbit it, then leave without scanning it at all
			# orbit it and perform a simple scan
			# orbit it, perform a simple scan, then perform a surface scan (and possibly send down a lander)
			I know that a surface scan is not required, but can you leave without performing a simple scan (this is what brings up the planet stats)?
			-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:39, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)

			:Orbiting is enough. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 13:08, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)

			Argh! This is what frustrates me about the Ultronomicon -- is it an in-character encyclopedia of plot information about the game's world, or is it an out-of-character strategy guide telling you how to play the game?

			It should either be classified as one or the other, or contain a strict internal organization separating one kind of content from the other, because right now it's a horrible mishmash of both in many of the articles that makes it a pain to read. Things that have both in-story plot info and out-of-story game info should be split into "Story" and "Game" sections, and this should be standardized. It's impossible to make an article sound good that talks about both the lore of the Rainbow Worlds and tells you "You can get credit for it in the game without doing a simple scan; you get 500 credits for it; this is a good way to win the game".

			This is why I've tried to introduce the practice of including blatantly out-of-story facts in [brackets] and moving whole sections that are blatantly out-of-story ("Menus You Can Access at the Starbase") out of the story articles. But it's an uphill battle if other people aren't on the same page about this.[[User:130.58.248.41\|130.58.248.41]]


			I agree. Mixing in-story and out-of-story elemnts is not a good idea. But I do think both have their place in the Ultronomicon. I'd like it to be a reference of all things Star Control. So separate sections seems to be the way to go for me. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:33, 22 Feb 2005 (CET)

			As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to. [[User:24.37.65.110\|24.37.65.110]]

67.65.34.149: /* Clarification */

2005-08-26T00:07:32Z

Clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 26 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)		Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)

	~~== Clarification ==~~		[http://www.smartsearch.name/fxclub/index.html Forextrading]

	~~"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."~~
	~~There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:~~
	~~# orbit it, then leave without scanning it at all~~
	~~# orbit it and perform a simple scan~~
	~~# orbit it, perform a simple scan, then perform a surface scan (and possibly send down a lander)~~
	~~I know that a surface scan is not required, but can you leave without performing a simple scan (this is what brings up the planet stats)?~~
	~~-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:39, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)~~

	~~:Orbiting is enough. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 13:08, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)~~

	Argh! This is what frustrates me about the Ultronomicon -- is it an in-character encyclopedia of plot information about the game's world, or is it an out-of-character strategy guide telling you how to play the game?

	It should either be classified as one or the other, or contain a strict internal organization separating one kind of content from the other, because right now it's a horrible mishmash of both in many of the articles that makes it a pain to read. Things that have both in-story plot info and out-of-story game info should be split into "Story" and "Game" sections, and this should be standardized. It's impossible to make an article sound good that talks about both the lore of the Rainbow Worlds and tells you "You can get credit for it in the game without doing a simple scan; you get 500 credits for it; this is a good way to win the game".

	This is why I've tried to introduce the practice of including blatantly out-of-story facts in [brackets] and moving whole sections that are blatantly out-of-story ("Menus You Can Access at the Starbase") out of the story articles. But it's an uphill battle if other people aren't on the same page about this.[[User:130.58.248.41\|130.58.248.41]]


	I agree. Mixing in-story and out-of-story elemnts is not a good idea. But I do think both have their place in the Ultronomicon. I'd like it to be a reference of all things Star Control. So separate sections seems to be the way to go for me. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:33, 22 Feb 2005 (CET)

	~~As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to.~~ [~~[User~~:~~24.37.65.110\|24~~.37.65.~~110]~~]

Svdb: unspam

2005-08-23T12:51:15Z

unspam

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)
-[http://home-equity-loan.corp.st home-equity-loan.corp.st]Hi all!
+== Clarification ==
-BEST info about hotels, motels, inns, travels and more:
-[http://find.all-hotels-motels.com/index.html all-hotels-motels.com]
+"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."
-Best regarts, Mike Tison
+There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:

69.231.148.188 at 08:56, 23 August 2005

2005-08-23T08:56:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 23 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)		Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)

	[http://home-equity-loan.corp.st home-equity-loan.corp.st]		[http://home-equity-loan.corp.st home-equity-loan.corp.st]Hi all!
			BEST info about hotels, motels, inns, travels and more:
			[http://find.all-hotels-motels.com/index.html all-hotels-motels.com]
			Best regarts, Mike Tison

24.200.233.83: /* Clarification */

2005-08-22T23:20:43Z

Clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 22 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)		Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)

	~~== Clarification ==~~		[http://home-equity-loan.corp.st home-equity-loan.corp.st]

	~~"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."~~
	~~There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:~~
	~~# orbit it, then leave without scanning it at all~~
	~~# orbit it and perform a simple scan~~
	~~# orbit it, perform a simple scan, then perform a surface scan (and possibly send down a lander)~~
	~~I know that a surface scan is not required, but can you leave without performing a simple scan (this is what brings up the planet stats)?~~
	~~-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:39, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)~~

	~~:Orbiting is enough. --~~ [~~[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 13~~:~~08, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)~~

	Argh! This is what frustrates me about the Ultronomicon -- is it an in-character encyclopedia of plot information about the game's world, or is it an out-of-character strategy guide telling you how to play the game?

	It should either be classified as one or the other, or contain a strict internal organization separating one kind of content from the other, because right now it's a horrible mishmash of both in many of the articles that makes it a pain to read. Things that have both in-story plot info and out-of-story game info should be split into "Story" and "Game" sections, and this should be standardized. It's impossible to make an article sound good that talks about both the lore of the Rainbow Worlds and tells you "You can get credit for it in the game without doing a simple scan; you get 500 credits for it; this is a good way to win the game".

	~~This is why I've tried to introduce the practice of including blatantly out-of-story facts in [brackets] and moving whole sections that are blatantly out~~-of-~~story ("Menus You Can Access at the Starbase") out of the story articles. But it's an uphill battle if other people aren't on the same page about this.[[User:130.58.248.41\|130.58.248~~.~~41]]~~


	~~I agree~~. ~~Mixing in~~-story and out-of-story elemnts is not a good idea. But I do think both have their place in the Ultronomicon. I'd like it to be a reference of all things Star Control. So separate sections seems to be the way to go for me. - ~~[[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:33, 22 Feb 2005 (CET)~~

	~~As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to. [[User:24.37.65.110\|24.37~~.65.~~110]~~]

Fyzixfighter: reverting spam, kept comment by 24.37.65.110?

2005-08-22T06:32:40Z

reverting spam, kept comment by 24.37.65.110?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:32, 22 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)		Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)

	As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to.		== Clarification ==

			"You need to orbit the planet for it to be registered. A surface scan is not required."
			There are three things that you can do when in proximity with a planet:
			# orbit it, then leave without scanning it at all
			# orbit it and perform a simple scan
			# orbit it, perform a simple scan, then perform a surface scan (and possibly send down a lander)
			I know that a surface scan is not required, but can you leave without performing a simple scan (this is what brings up the planet stats)?
			-[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 00:39, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)

			:Orbiting is enough. -- [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 13:08, 14 Nov 2004 (CET)

			Argh! This is what frustrates me about the Ultronomicon -- is it an in-character encyclopedia of plot information about the game's world, or is it an out-of-character strategy guide telling you how to play the game?

			It should either be classified as one or the other, or contain a strict internal organization separating one kind of content from the other, because right now it's a horrible mishmash of both in many of the articles that makes it a pain to read. Things that have both in-story plot info and out-of-story game info should be split into "Story" and "Game" sections, and this should be standardized. It's impossible to make an article sound good that talks about both the lore of the Rainbow Worlds and tells you "You can get credit for it in the game without doing a simple scan; you get 500 credits for it; this is a good way to win the game".

			This is why I've tried to introduce the practice of including blatantly out-of-story facts in [brackets] and moving whole sections that are blatantly out-of-story ("Menus You Can Access at the Starbase") out of the story articles. But it's an uphill battle if other people aren't on the same page about this.[[User:130.58.248.41\|130.58.248.41]]


			I agree. Mixing in-story and out-of-story elemnts is not a good idea. But I do think both have their place in the Ultronomicon. I'd like it to be a reference of all things Star Control. So separate sections seems to be the way to go for me. - [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:33, 22 Feb 2005 (CET)

			As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to. [[User:24.37.65.110\|24.37.65.110]]

24.37.65.110: Deleted some spam (no ban - I'm not admin)

2005-08-22T03:44:03Z

Deleted some spam (no ban - I'm not admin)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:44, 22 August 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)		Whoops, my bad! I got so caught up in merging the planet type info I phased out. Rainbow worlds definitely need their own page. --[[User:Jacius\|Jacius]] 03:27, 26 Oct 2004 (CEST)

	~~[http://phentermine.w3.~~to ~~Phentermine][http://phentermine-pills.euro.tm phentermine-drugs.euro~~.~~tm]Hi all!~~		As I recall they form an arrow, but this wiki doesn't seem to say what it points to.
	~~BEST info about hotels, motels, inns, travels and more:~~
	~~[http://find.all-hotels-motels.com/index.html all-hotels-motels.com]~~
	~~Best regarts, Mike Tison~~