Talk:Syreen - Revision history

Shiver: Reverted edits by 74.110.145.84 (Talk) to last revision by 72.138.105.236

2010-06-15T23:06:52Z

Reverted edits by 74.110.145.84 (Talk) to last revision by 72.138.105.236

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 15 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~This~~ is ~~an interedting peace but just a quick question~~, ~~in one of~~ the ~~references it says its from a~~		A footnote here refers to specific pages of the SC2 manual. But there are several variants of the manual, presumably each with different numberings. I know that at least the numbers mentioned here don't match what I've got in the .pdf file that came with my copy.
	'''~~== VIDEO GAME ==~~''' ~~so why is~~ it ~~fromm there??~~?!		So we'd either need to decide on some standard edition, specifically mention which version is used, or leave out the page numbers altogether (and perhaps mention the section title).
			Thoughts?
			— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:34, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

			Oh, the reference was to the SC '''1''' manual. There may not be a problem after all. (Then again, there still might be). — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:42, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

			:Blast, you beat me to it! My guess would be that variations, if any, are probably by platform. I've got .pdf copies of a PC SC1 manual, a PC SC2 manual, the 3DO manual. If the variations are by platform, I think stating the platform (PC, Sega Genesis, 3DO) should be enough to identify the manual. Using section titles can be a bit awkward and harder to look up. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 09:11, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

			In the 3DO manual (specifically page 32), it reads "Syreen scientists have developed a psionic amplifier that compels even the most hostile alien to serve his Syreen ship captain with perfect faithfulness." Should this be included somewhere in the article? -- Anonymous

74.110.145.84: stuff

2010-06-15T20:45:24Z

stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 15 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'~~'THIS''' IS SO SAD.~~'''''		This is an interedting peace but just a quick question, in one of the references it says its from a
			'''== VIDEO GAME ==''' so why is it fromm there???!

74.110.145.84: yup thats pretty much all i wanted to say.

2010-06-15T20:43:43Z

yup thats pretty much all i wanted to say.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 15 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~A footnote here refers to specific pages of the SC2 manual. But there are several variants of the manual, presumably each with different numberings. I know that at least the numbers mentioned here don~~'~~t match what I~~'~~ve got in the .pdf file that came with my copy.~~		''THIS''' IS SO SAD.'''''
	~~So we~~'~~d either need to decide on some standard edition, specifically mention which version is used, or leave out the page numbers altogether (and perhaps mention the section title).~~
	~~Thoughts?~~
	~~— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:34, 21 October 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~Oh, the reference was to the SC~~ '''1''' ~~manual. There may not be a problem after all. (Then again, there still might be). — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:42, 21 October 2006 (CEST)~~

	~~:Blast, you beat me to it! My guess would be that variations, if any, are probably by platform. I~~'ve got .pdf copies of a PC SC1 manual, a PC SC2 manual, the 3DO manual. If the variations are by platform, I think stating the platform (PC, Sega Genesis, 3DO) should be enough to identify the manual. Using section titles can be a bit awkward and harder to look up. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 09:11, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

	In the 3DO manual (specifically page 32), it reads "Syreen scientists have developed a psionic amplifier that compels even the most hostile alien to serve his Syreen ship captain with perfect faithfulness." Should this be included somewhere in the article? -- Anonymous

72.138.105.236 at 15:14, 4 June 2007

2007-06-04T15:14:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 4 June 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:Blast, you beat me to it! My guess would be that variations, if any, are probably by platform. I've got .pdf copies of a PC SC1 manual, a PC SC2 manual, the 3DO manual. If the variations are by platform, I think stating the platform (PC, Sega Genesis, 3DO) should be enough to identify the manual. Using section titles can be a bit awkward and harder to look up. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 09:11, 21 October 2006 (CEST)		:Blast, you beat me to it! My guess would be that variations, if any, are probably by platform. I've got .pdf copies of a PC SC1 manual, a PC SC2 manual, the 3DO manual. If the variations are by platform, I think stating the platform (PC, Sega Genesis, 3DO) should be enough to identify the manual. Using section titles can be a bit awkward and harder to look up. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 09:11, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

			In the 3DO manual (specifically page 32), it reads "Syreen scientists have developed a psionic amplifier that compels even the most hostile alien to serve his Syreen ship captain with perfect faithfulness." Should this be included somewhere in the article? -- Anonymous

Fyzixfighter: reply

2006-10-21T07:11:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 21 October 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Oh, the reference was to the SC '''1''' manual. There may not be a problem after all. (Then again, there still might be). — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:42, 21 October 2006 (CEST)		Oh, the reference was to the SC '''1''' manual. There may not be a problem after all. (Then again, there still might be). — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:42, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

			:Blast, you beat me to it! My guess would be that variations, if any, are probably by platform. I've got .pdf copies of a PC SC1 manual, a PC SC2 manual, the 3DO manual. If the variations are by platform, I think stating the platform (PC, Sega Genesis, 3DO) should be enough to identify the manual. Using section titles can be a bit awkward and harder to look up. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 09:11, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

Svdb: SC1 manual, not SC2

2006-10-21T06:42:25Z

SC1 manual, not SC2

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:42, 21 October 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Thoughts?		Thoughts?
	— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:34, 21 October 2006 (CEST)		— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:34, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

			Oh, the reference was to the SC '''1''' manual. There may not be a problem after all. (Then again, there still might be). — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 08:42, 21 October 2006 (CEST)

Svdb: page references

2006-10-21T06:34:12Z

page references

New page

A footnote here refers to specific pages of the SC2 manual. But there are several variants of the manual, presumably each with different numberings. I know that at least the numbers mentioned here don't match what I've got in the .pdf file that came with my copy.
So we'd either need to decide on some standard edition, specifically mention which version is used, or leave out the page numbers altogether (and perhaps mention the section title).
Thoughts?
— [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 08:34, 21 October 2006 (CEST)