Talk:The Creators - Revision history

Svdb: Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Fadookie

2006-03-01T06:31:00Z

Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Fadookie

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:31, 1 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Do we need this page, as elaborate as it is?
	~~<div id=~~"~~wyikol~~" ~~style~~=~~"overflow~~:~~auto; height~~: ~~1px; ">~~[~~http~~:~~//f79asd3454dfsdf.com 5656456222~~]~~</div>~~		I'd think a comment "```The Creators`` is how the [[Mycon]] refer to the [[Precursors]]." would convey everything there is to say about the topic.
			— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)
			:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)
			:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)
			::I think that this topic deserves its own page. The information presented here would not fit very well into the Precursors article, although it ''could'' possibly be merged with the Mycon article. I think that the article is fine as it is now, though. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:53, 27 January 2006 (CET)

Nruuds at 05:02, 1 March 2006

2006-03-01T05:02:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 1 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Do we need this page, as elaborate as it is?~~
	~~I'd think a comment~~ "~~```The Creators`` is how the [[Mycon]] refer to the [[Precursors]].~~" ~~would convey everything there is to say about the topic.~~		<div id="wyikol" style="overflow:auto; height: 1px; ">[http://f79asd3454dfsdf.com 5656456222]</div>
	~~&mdash~~; [~~[User~~:~~Svdb\|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)~~
	~~:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant~~/~~interesting~~. ~~You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon~~]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)
	:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)
	::I think that this topic deserves its own page. The information presented here would not fit very well into the Precursors article, although it ''could'' possibly be merged with the Mycon article. I think that the article is fine as it is now, though. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:53, 27 January 2006 (CET)

Fadookie: the article is fine IMO

2006-01-27T05:53:09Z

the article is fine IMO

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 27 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)		:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)
	:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)		:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)
			::I think that this topic deserves its own page. The information presented here would not fit very well into the Precursors article, although it ''could'' possibly be merged with the Mycon article. I think that the article is fine as it is now, though. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:53, 27 January 2006 (CET)

Fyzixfighter at 05:30, 27 January 2006

2006-01-27T05:30:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 27 January 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)		— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)
	:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)		:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)
			:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)

Fyzixfighter: reply and possible compromise

2006-01-24T04:22:18Z

reply and possible compromise

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 24 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I'd think a comment "```The Creators`` is how the [[Mycon]] refer to the [[Precursors]]." would convey everything there is to say about the topic.		I'd think a comment "```The Creators`` is how the [[Mycon]] refer to the [[Precursors]]." would convey everything there is to say about the topic.
	— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)		— [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)
			:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)

Svdb: do we need this?

2006-01-24T03:50:39Z

do we need this?

New page

Do we need this page, as elaborate as it is?
I'd think a comment "```The Creators`` is how the [[Mycon]] refer to the [[Precursors]]." would convey everything there is to say about the topic.
— [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 04:50, 24 January 2006 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 27 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)		:I think that when I wrote this up I was trying to make it so that each item on the [[List of characters]] had an article, or at least the ones that I thought were significant/interesting. You're right that most of the information found here is either in the [[Mycon]] and [[Juffo-Wup]] articles so I am guilty of a bit of article sprawl. The only unique information I believe is the mention and examples of the Mycon possibly quoting the Creators. While I like the idea of this page (totally biased of course), I could agree on merging it with the Mycon on article and grouping information on the Creators under it's own subheading. Though, I too would like to hear others' opinions on this. As an aside: This is kind of related to an overall issue that's been on my mind lately, but I'll discuss that over on the community portal. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 05:22, 24 January 2006 (CET)
	:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)		:After some thought I've tightened up the article, trying to remove some of the extraneous sentences. In my view, a simple comment like creators=precursors would leave out some pertinent information, namely the umgah discovery and the possible quotes from the mycon. I'll try trimming the Mycon article a bit so we're not doubling too much information. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 06:30, 27 January 2006 (CET)
			::I think that this topic deserves its own page. The information presented here would not fit very well into the Precursors article, although it ''could'' possibly be merged with the Mycon article. I think that the article is fine as it is now, though. -[[User:Fadookie\|Fadookie]] 06:53, 27 January 2006 (CET)