Talk:VUX - Revision history

Fyzixfighter: Reverted edits by 95.168.183.233 (Talk) to last revision by Masterius

2010-10-01T18:42:51Z

Reverted edits by 95.168.183.233 (Talk) to last revision by Masterius

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 1 October 2010
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::::<nowiki>sighs at Valaggar</nowiki>		:::::<nowiki>sighs at Valaggar</nowiki>
	:::::Are Fred Ford and Paul Reiche III still visiting IRC chats? Can someone ask them the question? [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:32, 24 January 2009 (CET)		:::::Are Fred Ford and Paul Reiche III still visiting IRC chats? Can someone ask them the question? [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:32, 24 January 2009 (CET)

	~~== Private Krankenversicherung ==~~

	~~the useful advises you presented do help our team's research for our group, appreaciate that.~~

	~~- Lucas~~

95.168.183.233: /* Private Krankenversicherung */ new section

2010-10-01T16:30:18Z

Private Krankenversicherung: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 1 October 2010
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:::::<nowiki>sighs at Valaggar</nowiki>		:::::<nowiki>sighs at Valaggar</nowiki>
	:::::Are Fred Ford and Paul Reiche III still visiting IRC chats? Can someone ask them the question? [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:32, 24 January 2009 (CET)		:::::Are Fred Ford and Paul Reiche III still visiting IRC chats? Can someone ask them the question? [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:32, 24 January 2009 (CET)

			== Private Krankenversicherung ==

			the useful advises you presented do help our team's research for our group, appreaciate that.

			- Lucas

Masterius: /* VUX neck */

2009-01-24T13:32:30Z

VUX neck

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 24 January 2009
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::::Come on, Val - simmer down. There is no need to get rude, hostile and vulgar. Indeed, Masterius kind of reminds me of you when you first came on to the scene with the Linch-Nas-Ploh and Zoq-Fot-Pik stuff.		::::Come on, Val - simmer down. There is no need to get rude, hostile and vulgar. Indeed, Masterius kind of reminds me of you when you first came on to the scene with the Linch-Nas-Ploh and Zoq-Fot-Pik stuff.
	::::Anyways, @ Masterius, I understand your reasoning and it does make sense. However, that VUX have necks cannot be proven by contradiction, i.e. the quote can still make sense if the VUX didn't have necks. There are assumptions that are inherent in both interpretations. Thus, without further enlightenment from the creators, the logical compromise is to let the text also be ambiguous. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:09, 23 January 2009 (CET)		::::Anyways, @ Masterius, I understand your reasoning and it does make sense. However, that VUX have necks cannot be proven by contradiction, i.e. the quote can still make sense if the VUX didn't have necks. There are assumptions that are inherent in both interpretations. Thus, without further enlightenment from the creators, the logical compromise is to let the text also be ambiguous. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:09, 23 January 2009 (CET)

			:::::<nowiki>sighs at Valaggar</nowiki>
			:::::Are Fred Ford and Paul Reiche III still visiting IRC chats? Can someone ask them the question? [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:32, 24 January 2009 (CET)

Fyzixfighter: /* VUX neck */ gist of my argument - and simmer down Val

2009-01-23T22:09:14Z

VUX neck: gist of my argument - and simmer down Val

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 23 January 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:::Stop making stupid posts, Masterius. That quote is ambiguous, period. Full stop. End of story.		:::Stop making stupid posts, Masterius. That quote is ambiguous, period. Full stop. End of story.
	:::Fuck off. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 18:38, 23 January 2009 (CET)		:::Fuck off. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 18:38, 23 January 2009 (CET)

			::::Come on, Val - simmer down. There is no need to get rude, hostile and vulgar. Indeed, Masterius kind of reminds me of you when you first came on to the scene with the Linch-Nas-Ploh and Zoq-Fot-Pik stuff.
			::::Anyways, @ Masterius, I understand your reasoning and it does make sense. However, that VUX have necks cannot be proven by contradiction, i.e. the quote can still make sense if the VUX didn't have necks. There are assumptions that are inherent in both interpretations. Thus, without further enlightenment from the creators, the logical compromise is to let the text also be ambiguous. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 23:09, 23 January 2009 (CET)

Valaggar: /* VUX neck */ reply

2009-01-23T17:38:40Z

VUX neck: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 23 January 2009
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:39, 22 January 2009 (CET)		::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:39, 22 January 2009 (CET)
	::Plus, for them saying "Our necks do not share" would be again against their bigotry, as they are not interested in serious discussions with Captain, and simply want to insult Captain with what they see different to them and with what they associate Captain's flexible human neck. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 18:02, 23 January 2009 (CET)		::Plus, for them saying "Our necks do not share" would be again against their bigotry, as they are not interested in serious discussions with Captain, and simply want to insult Captain with what they see different to them and with what they associate Captain's flexible human neck. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 18:02, 23 January 2009 (CET)

			:::Stop making stupid posts, Masterius. That quote is ambiguous, period. Full stop. End of story.
			:::Fuck off. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 18:38, 23 January 2009 (CET)

Masterius: /* VUX neck */

2009-01-23T17:02:07Z

VUX neck

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 23 January 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:

	::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:39, 22 January 2009 (CET)		::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:39, 22 January 2009 (CET)
			::Plus, for them saying "Our necks do not share" would be again against their bigotry, as they are not interested in serious discussions with Captain, and simply want to insult Captain with what they see different to them and with what they associate Captain's flexible human neck. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 18:02, 23 January 2009 (CET)

Masterius: /* VUX neck */

2009-01-22T13:39:02Z

VUX neck

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 22 January 2009
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:That is one interpretation, but it is not the only interpretation - at best the statement is ambiguous. Look at it the other way around: Can the sentence still make sense if the VUX don't have necks? I would argue that it can. If they were to say "Our necks do not share...", then it would be much more definite. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 19:23, 21 January 2009 (CET)		:That is one interpretation, but it is not the only interpretation - at best the statement is ambiguous. Look at it the other way around: Can the sentence still make sense if the VUX don't have necks? I would argue that it can. If they were to say "Our necks do not share...", then it would be much more definite. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 19:23, 21 January 2009 (CET)

	::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence.		::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 14:39, 22 January 2009 (CET)

Masterius: /* VUX neck */

2009-01-22T13:38:41Z

VUX neck

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 22 January 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:

	:That is one interpretation, but it is not the only interpretation - at best the statement is ambiguous. Look at it the other way around: Can the sentence still make sense if the VUX don't have necks? I would argue that it can. If they were to say "Our necks do not share...", then it would be much more definite. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 19:23, 21 January 2009 (CET)		:That is one interpretation, but it is not the only interpretation - at best the statement is ambiguous. Look at it the other way around: Can the sentence still make sense if the VUX don't have necks? I would argue that it can. If they were to say "Our necks do not share...", then it would be much more definite. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 19:23, 21 January 2009 (CET)

			::But why won't they say "as though your ''head'' is broken"? If they didn't have necks, they wouldn't mention them, as they would perfectly know that necks ''are'' not rigid. They have met Yehat before, and birds' necks are flexible. But if they had rigid necks and say Captain about "neck is broken"", this clearly shows their bigoted nature and makes sence.

Fyzixfighter: /* VUX neck */ quick reply

2009-01-21T18:23:15Z

VUX neck: quick reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 21 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:

	[[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 12:14, 21 January 2009 (CET)		[[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 12:14, 21 January 2009 (CET)

			:That is one interpretation, but it is not the only interpretation - at best the statement is ambiguous. Look at it the other way around: Can the sentence still make sense if the VUX don't have necks? I would argue that it can. If they were to say "Our necks do not share...", then it would be much more definite. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 19:23, 21 January 2009 (CET)

Masterius: /* VUX neck */

2009-01-21T11:14:36Z

VUX neck

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 21 January 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:
	''Now if you don't mind, stop nodding your head like that. We VUX do not share this range of motion and it appears as though your neck is broken and you are a jabbering corpse. Ugh.''		''Now if you don't mind, stop nodding your head like that. We VUX do not share this range of motion and it appears as though your neck is broken and you are a jabbering corpse. Ugh.''

	This indicates that they 'have' neck which is fixed in position (therefore, neck is not broken), while captain's head nods, and this appears to VUX, as if human's neck is broken. [[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 12:14, 21 January 2009 (CET)		This indicates that they 'have' neck which is fixed in position (therefore, neck is not broken), while captain's head nods, and this appears to VUX, as if human's neck is broken.

			[[User:Masterius\|Masterius]] 12:14, 21 January 2009 (CET)