Talk:Zoq-Fot-Pik - Revision history

Fyzixfighter: Reverted edit of 219.87.178.116, changed back to last version by Valaggar

2007-11-05T01:39:30Z

Reverted edit of 219.87.178.116, changed back to last version by Valaggar

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 5 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~acelermon~~
	==Whoa, whoa, whoa==		==Whoa, whoa, whoa==

Line 34:		Line 33:
	:::::You have something stem-like, and something leave-like. That's a whole lot more than you have than with your frog. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:04, 3 April 2007 (CEST)		:::::You have something stem-like, and something leave-like. That's a whole lot more than you have than with your frog. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:04, 3 April 2007 (CEST)

	:		::::::The general shape is that of a frog. Also, nobody is puzzled as to why a plant could evolve to sentience, such as with the Supox. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 16:12, 3 April 2007 (CEST)
	~~1000~~
	:::::The general shape is that of a frog. Also, nobody is puzzled as to why a plant could evolve to sentience, such as with the Supox. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 16:12, 3 April 2007 (CEST)

	:::::::General shape? You mean that if you fill up the area occupied with the Zoq, to make it one green blob with eyes, then it looks a bit more like a frog?		:::::::General shape? You mean that if you fill up the area occupied with the Zoq, to make it one green blob with eyes, then it looks a bit more like a frog?

219.87.178.116 at 01:06, 5 November 2007

2007-11-05T01:06:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 5 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			acelermon
	==Whoa, whoa, whoa==		==Whoa, whoa, whoa==

Line 33:		Line 34:
	:::::You have something stem-like, and something leave-like. That's a whole lot more than you have than with your frog. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:04, 3 April 2007 (CEST)		:::::You have something stem-like, and something leave-like. That's a whole lot more than you have than with your frog. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 16:04, 3 April 2007 (CEST)

	::::::The general shape is that of a frog. Also, nobody is puzzled as to why a plant could evolve to sentience, such as with the Supox. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 16:12, 3 April 2007 (CEST)		:
			1000
			:::::The general shape is that of a frog. Also, nobody is puzzled as to why a plant could evolve to sentience, such as with the Supox. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 16:12, 3 April 2007 (CEST)

	:::::::General shape? You mean that if you fill up the area occupied with the Zoq, to make it one green blob with eyes, then it looks a bit more like a frog?		:::::::General shape? You mean that if you fill up the area occupied with the Zoq, to make it one green blob with eyes, then it looks a bit more like a frog?

Valaggar: /* Silent One Eyed Creatures */

2007-08-25T07:48:48Z

Silent One Eyed Creatures

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 25 August 2007
Line 68:		Line 68:
	== Silent One Eyed Creatures ==		== Silent One Eyed Creatures ==
	where is the evidence that all one eyed creatures are silent? the only one eyed creature we meet is silent however if we take that to mean all one eyed creatures are then we would also have to accept that all springs like frungy and all plant/snakes dont.		where is the evidence that all one eyed creatures are silent? the only one eyed creature we meet is silent however if we take that to mean all one eyed creatures are then we would also have to accept that all springs like frungy and all plant/snakes dont.

			:Point taken. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 09:48, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

79.67.75.14: /* Silent One Eyed Creatures */

2007-08-25T00:39:03Z

Silent One Eyed Creatures

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, 25 August 2007
Line 67:		Line 67:

	== Silent One Eyed Creatures ==		== Silent One Eyed Creatures ==
	where is the evidence that all one eyed creatures are silent? the only one eyed creature we meet is silent however if we take that to mean all one eyed creatures then we would also ~~ahve~~ to accept that all springs like frungy and all plant/snakes dont.		where is the evidence that all one eyed creatures are silent? the only one eyed creature we meet is silent however if we take that to mean all one eyed creatures are then we would also have to accept that all springs like frungy and all plant/snakes dont.

79.67.75.14 at 00:35, 25 August 2007

2007-08-25T00:35:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:35, 25 August 2007
Line 65:		Line 65:

	::OK, I had just never caught that. Thanks for clearing that up. --[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 02:50, 3 June 2007 (CEST)		::OK, I had just never caught that. Thanks for clearing that up. --[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 02:50, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

			== Silent One Eyed Creatures ==
			where is the evidence that all one eyed creatures are silent? the only one eyed creature we meet is silent however if we take that to mean all one eyed creatures then we would also ahve to accept that all springs like frungy and all plant/snakes dont.

Gaeamil: /* Psychic?! */ reply

2007-06-03T00:50:23Z

Psychic?!: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 3 June 2007
Line 63:		Line 63:

	:If I can jump in for Val here - see the GENERAL_INFO_4# responses in the ZFP conversations where the "Zoq" claims to be "somewhat sensitive to certain meta-psychic vibrations", followed by some humorous dialog with the "Pik", and ending with a hint to check out the Orionis constellation for some strong psychic activity, ie the neo-Dnyarri. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 07:36, 2 June 2007 (CEST)		:If I can jump in for Val here - see the GENERAL_INFO_4# responses in the ZFP conversations where the "Zoq" claims to be "somewhat sensitive to certain meta-psychic vibrations", followed by some humorous dialog with the "Pik", and ending with a hint to check out the Orionis constellation for some strong psychic activity, ie the neo-Dnyarri. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 07:36, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

			::OK, I had just never caught that. Thanks for clearing that up. --[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 02:50, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Fyzixfighter: /* Psychic?! */ reply

2007-06-02T05:36:26Z

Psychic?!: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 2 June 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:
	== Psychic?! ==		== Psychic?! ==
	Val, where did you find that the Zoq posess slight psychic abilities? I never saw that. Mostly I'm just curious.--[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 07:21, 2 June 2007 (CEST)		Val, where did you find that the Zoq posess slight psychic abilities? I never saw that. Mostly I'm just curious.--[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 07:21, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

			:If I can jump in for Val here - see the GENERAL_INFO_4# responses in the ZFP conversations where the "Zoq" claims to be "somewhat sensitive to certain meta-psychic vibrations", followed by some humorous dialog with the "Pik", and ending with a hint to check out the Orionis constellation for some strong psychic activity, ie the neo-Dnyarri. --[[User:Fyzixfighter\|Fyzixfighter]] 07:36, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Gaeamil: Question about recent edit

2007-06-02T05:21:58Z

Question about recent edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 2 June 2007
Line 58:		Line 58:

	:Only a particular Pik or two. There's no reason to believe that it's a racewide thing, or that no Zoq like it.--[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 23:44, 6 May 2007 (CEST)		:Only a particular Pik or two. There's no reason to believe that it's a racewide thing, or that no Zoq like it.--[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 23:44, 6 May 2007 (CEST)

			== Psychic?! ==
			Val, where did you find that the Zoq posess slight psychic abilities? I never saw that. Mostly I'm just curious.--[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 07:21, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Gaeamil: /* Frungy */ forgot to sign

2007-05-06T21:44:41Z

Frungy: forgot to sign

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 6 May 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	Only the Pik are obsessed with Frungy in-game, the Zoq hate it. Shouldn't we say "the Pik" instead of "some Zoq-Fot-Pik"? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 15:58, 6 May 2007 (CEST)		Only the Pik are obsessed with Frungy in-game, the Zoq hate it. Shouldn't we say "the Pik" instead of "some Zoq-Fot-Pik"? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 15:58, 6 May 2007 (CEST)

	:Only a particular Pik or two. There's no reason to believe that it's a racewide thing, or that no Zoq like it.		:Only a particular Pik or two. There's no reason to believe that it's a racewide thing, or that no Zoq like it.--[[User:Gaeamil\|Gaeamil]] 23:44, 6 May 2007 (CEST)

Gaeamil: /* Frungy */ reply

2007-05-06T21:44:15Z

Frungy: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 6 May 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:

	Only the Pik are obsessed with Frungy in-game, the Zoq hate it. Shouldn't we say "the Pik" instead of "some Zoq-Fot-Pik"? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 15:58, 6 May 2007 (CEST)		Only the Pik are obsessed with Frungy in-game, the Zoq hate it. Shouldn't we say "the Pik" instead of "some Zoq-Fot-Pik"? [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 15:58, 6 May 2007 (CEST)

			:Only a particular Pik or two. There's no reason to believe that it's a racewide thing, or that no Zoq like it.