User talk:Shiver - Revision history

Shiver: reply

2013-05-02T06:40:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 2 May 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)		:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


	I'm curious on what graphics you did on Project 6014. In my opinion, that should have been Star Control 3. --[[User:Yuubuuinsteadofyou\|Yuubuuinsteadofyou]] ([[User talk:Yuubuuinsteadofyou\|talk]]) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (CEST)		I'm curious on what graphics you did on Project 6014. In my opinion, that should have been Star Control 3. --[[User:Yuubuuinsteadofyou\|Yuubuuinsteadofyou]] ([[User talk:Yuubuuinsteadofyou\|talk]]) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (CEST)

			:Not many. The weapon effects of the Chmmr Explorer, and the blue slave shields. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] ([[User talk:Shiver\|talk]]) 08:40, 2 May 2013 (CEST)

	== Druuge ==		== Druuge ==

Yuubuuinsteadofyou at 22:34, 24 April 2013

2013-04-24T22:34:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 24 April 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)		:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

			I'm curious on what graphics you did on Project 6014. In my opinion, that should have been Star Control 3. --[[User:Yuubuuinsteadofyou\|Yuubuuinsteadofyou]] ([[User talk:Yuubuuinsteadofyou\|talk]]) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (CEST)

	== Druuge ==		== Druuge ==

Shiver: purging nonsense

2010-12-29T20:27:20Z

purging nonsense

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 29 December 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

	I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they are the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

	~~:Where is this? I don't see anything in super melee that suggests which faction any given ship is associated with. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 07:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)~~

	~~== Spathi ==~~

	~~Did the Spathi have joined the Alliance? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 03:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)~~

Videogamer13: /* Spathi */ new section

2010-12-26T03:18:00Z

Spathi: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 26 December 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Where is this? I don't see anything in super melee that suggests which faction any given ship is associated with. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 07:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)		:Where is this? I don't see anything in super melee that suggests which faction any given ship is associated with. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 07:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

			== Spathi ==

			Did the Spathi have joined the Alliance? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 03:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Shiver: /* Druuge */ reply

2010-12-22T07:56:14Z

Druuge: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 22 December 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they are the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)		I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they are the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

			:Where is this? I don't see anything in super melee that suggests which faction any given ship is associated with. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 07:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Videogamer13: /* Druuge */

2010-12-22T06:16:45Z

Druuge

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:16, 22 December 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

	I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they is the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)		I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they are the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Videogamer13: /* Druuge */

2010-12-22T06:15:35Z

Druuge

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:15, 22 December 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)		:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

			I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they is the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Shiver: /* Druuge */ belated reply

2010-11-14T06:23:14Z

Druuge: belated reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:23, 14 November 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 19:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)		I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 19:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

			:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Magic9mushroom at 19:35, 6 September 2010

2010-09-06T19:35:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 6 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Druuge ==		== Druuge ==

	I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true.		I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true. [[User:Magic9mushroom\|Magic9mushroom]] 19:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Magic9mushroom: /* Druuge */ new section

2010-09-06T19:35:09Z

Druuge: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 6 September 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)		:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver\|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

			== Druuge ==

			I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true.