User talk:Zeracles - Revision history

Zeracles: /* Zercales plz don't ban me */

2015-07-24T05:58:55Z

Zercales plz don't ban me

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 24 July 2015
Line 218:		Line 218:
	Respectfully,		Respectfully,
	Ahmed4040amr		Ahmed4040amr
			:Don't do that again. If you want to discuss changes to or deletion of pages, please do so on talk pages. If you are unhappy with the conduct of another user you should refer them an admin, not deface their user pages. Uh, and if that user happens to be an admin, refer the matter to SvdB. --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] ([[User talk:Zeracles\|talk]]) 07:58, 24 July 2015 (CEST)

Ahmed4040amr: /* Zercales plz don't ban me */ new section

2015-07-23T23:08:22Z

Zercales plz don't ban me: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 23 July 2015
Line 212:		Line 212:

	Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)		Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

			== Zercales plz don't ban me ==

			'''It was an accident I am sure Ultronomicon can unedited my changes I told them I am sure they can do something'''
			Respectfully,
			Ahmed4040amr

Zeracles: /* MESSAGE TO ZERACLES */ moving comment to the article's talk page, where it belongs

2015-04-12T10:06:42Z

MESSAGE TO ZERACLES: moving comment to the article's talk page, where it belongs

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:06, 12 April 2015
Line 212:		Line 212:

	Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)		Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

	~~== MESSAGE TO ZERACLES ==~~

	Do you remember my SC2 teams article,I made it for [[beginners/people needing some data]] about the game's teams,since at first people just make untrue rumors about who is with who and some just get confused while reading articles about the alliance or a specific species,and my article is just a small summery to a large group of articles.
	~~'''THANK YOU!'''~~

Ahmed4040amr: /* MESSAGE TO ZERACLES */ new section

2015-04-03T19:37:00Z

MESSAGE TO ZERACLES: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:37, 3 April 2015
Line 212:		Line 212:

	Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)		Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

			== MESSAGE TO ZERACLES ==

			Do you remember my SC2 teams article,I made it for [[beginners/people needing some data]] about the game's teams,since at first people just make untrue rumors about who is with who and some just get confused while reading articles about the alliance or a specific species,and my article is just a small summery to a large group of articles.
			'''THANK YOU!'''

Shiver: Reverted edits by 62.193.126.4 (Talk) to last revision by Zeracles

2011-05-27T14:32:09Z

Reverted edits by 62.193.126.4 (Talk) to last revision by Zeracles

Show changes

62.193.126.4: /* Balancing the prices of UQM's ships */

2011-05-27T14:14:17Z

Balancing the prices of UQM's ships

Show changes

Zeracles: mving

2011-02-24T07:38:21Z

mving

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 24 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Admin?==
			You've been doing a lot of good work protecting the Ultronomicon from spammers.
			Would you like to be an administrator, so you can ban them too? — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 19:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
			:Okay, and I should probably get back to doing real work here too. Cheers --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 20:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
			::Even better. You're now an administrator. Good luck. — [[User:Svdb\|SvdB]] 23:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
	== Balancing the prices of UQM's ships ==		== Balancing the prices of UQM's ships ==

Videogamer13: /* Talk about Utwig */ new section

2010-11-03T16:28:39Z

Talk about Utwig: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 3 November 2010
Line 203:		Line 203:

	I haven't read through that thought starter of yours, maybe you'd like to develop it more first, but it looks very interesting. I forsee that you will become a great game theorist, almost as great as you are a linguist :) --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 19:08, 25 March 2008 (CET)		I haven't read through that thought starter of yours, maybe you'd like to develop it more first, but it looks very interesting. I forsee that you will become a great game theorist, almost as great as you are a linguist :) --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 19:08, 25 March 2008 (CET)

			== Talk about Utwig ==

			Did the Utwig join the Hierarchy? --[[User:Videogamer13\|Videogamer13]] 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Zeracles: Let the Games Begin!

2008-03-25T18:08:25Z

Let the Games Begin!

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 25 March 2008
Line 195:		Line 195:

	::[http://www.mediafire.com/?onxmotfrgex Here]'s the thing. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 21:33, 24 March 2008 (CET)		::[http://www.mediafire.com/?onxmotfrgex Here]'s the thing. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 21:33, 24 March 2008 (CET)
			===Let the Games Begin!===
			About what I meant, I was thinking the probabilities would be game theoretic, but as I said I hadn't and still haven't thought it through at all. So, if one goes back to where I first mentioned this with respect to the uber-ship problem, the opposite player will always choose the uber-ship, so the probability of facing anything but an uber-ship is zero. Of course, game theoretic solutions don't necessarily say what choices players should make with certainty, more generally, there are optimal probabilities assigned to choices. This is where one would get the probabilities to weight the x-values . . . somehow (and this does depend on the composition of the enemy fleet). I should have said it then.

			One can sort of scale that up too, the probability with which a player should select each possible fleet should be the same. The same as similar thoughts above.

			But since you're already following the game theory path (and I don't know much about it either), maybe the way to go is for me to investigate your algorithm, since you've abandoned it. This way we avoid duplication of effort. I would either exhaustively show that the algorithm doesn't work or find a spark of usefulness, so it's a win either way.

			I haven't read through that thought starter of yours, maybe you'd like to develop it more first, but it looks very interesting. I forsee that you will become a great game theorist, almost as great as you are a linguist :) --[[User:Zeracles\|Zeracles]] 19:08, 25 March 2008 (CET)

Valaggar: /* Weighting with Probability */ link to UQM Balance document

2008-03-24T20:33:35Z

Weighting with Probability: link to UQM Balance document

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 24 March 2008
Line 193:		Line 193:

	:I'm not sure what you mean (and I, frankly, haven't tried to hard to understand it either), but what I can reveal is that I've abandoned this over-simplistic way of looking at the problem (it's not going to be of any use, really — it doesn't even resemble the minimax algorithm much, which it should considering the [over]simplification it hinges upon), and am trying a rigorous, game theoretic approach. I have a document describing what I'm planning to do, but it's in Romanian; I'll translate it and put it here. I confess I haven't made much progress, both due to my absolute lack of knowledge in game theoretic matters, to the little time I've put in the problem, and to the complexity of the problem. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 20:11, 24 March 2008 (CET)		:I'm not sure what you mean (and I, frankly, haven't tried to hard to understand it either), but what I can reveal is that I've abandoned this over-simplistic way of looking at the problem (it's not going to be of any use, really — it doesn't even resemble the minimax algorithm much, which it should considering the [over]simplification it hinges upon), and am trying a rigorous, game theoretic approach. I have a document describing what I'm planning to do, but it's in Romanian; I'll translate it and put it here. I confess I haven't made much progress, both due to my absolute lack of knowledge in game theoretic matters, to the little time I've put in the problem, and to the complexity of the problem. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 20:11, 24 March 2008 (CET)

			::[http://www.mediafire.com/?onxmotfrgex Here]'s the thing. [[User:Valaggar\|Valaggar]] 21:33, 24 March 2008 (CET)