Difference between revisions of "Talk:Translations"
(reply) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:83.135.201.218|83.135.201.218]] 20:27, 25 February 2007 (CET) | [[User:83.135.201.218|83.135.201.218]] 20:27, 25 February 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | How would you phrase it? If the quality of the translation is low, it can still be almost completed. A comment "low quality" could be added, but I wouldn't do that on the opinion of just one person. | ||
| + | What is there not compatible with 0.5.0? I can think of no changes that were made to the content since 0.4 that would make a translation less compatible. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 17:53, 26 February 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 26 February 2007
I tried the German translation and I don't think you can say it's "almost completed"...
First of all it's for version 0.4 of UQM and not 100% compatible to 0.5 or newer (but you can make it compatible with some effort)...
Then, there are lots of mistakes in translation, orthographical, grammatical and even in content... Some things are translated badly, use of strange "slang", where it is not appropiate...
83.135.201.218 20:27, 25 February 2007 (CET)
How would you phrase it? If the quality of the translation is low, it can still be almost completed. A comment "low quality" could be added, but I wouldn't do that on the opinion of just one person. What is there not compatible with 0.5.0? I can think of no changes that were made to the content since 0.4 that would make a translation less compatible. — SvdB 17:53, 26 February 2007 (CET)