Difference between revisions of "Talk:Avatar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→thanks for the postEromynorFlell: new section) |
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 188.143.232.39 (Talk) to last revision by Fyzixfighter) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET) | :::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 22:02, 21 November 2010
I'm thinking of changing "Heavy X-Ray Laser" to "Heavy Laser". Ultronomicon regulars, do you agree or disagree? --Shiver 04:18, 29 January 2009 (CET)
- I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [1]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --Fyzixfighter 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET)
- I am not downloading Real Player to look at that, but I'll take your word that "Heavy X-Ray Laser" is canon. I didn't even play the 3DO version, so this is news to me. My reason for bringing this up is that I thought it was an ugly-sounding, non-canonical name. If anyone else dislikes the name, here's the place to speak up I guess. --Shiver 06:45, 30 January 2009 (CET)
- Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --Fyzixfighter 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)