Difference between revisions of "Talk:Avatar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (reply - need more info about reasons for wanting to change it) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [http://starcontrol.classicgaming.gamespy.com/3do/avatar.shtml]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET) | :I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [http://starcontrol.classicgaming.gamespy.com/3do/avatar.shtml]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I am not downloading Real Player to look at that, but I'll take your word that "Heavy X-Ray Laser" is canon. I didn't even play the 3DO version, so this is news to me. My reason for bringing this up is that I thought it was an ugly-sounding, non-canonical name. If anyone else dislikes the name, here's the place to speak up I guess. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 06:45, 30 January 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Fourshade: I've removed most of your recent work on this page's Tactical Overview. 1) Chmmr vs Kohr-Ah and Chmmr vs Androsynth are particular match-ups that do not need to be covered in an overview, and doing so clogs up the page. 2) Chmmr is indeed not very good against the Sa-Matra, and the page doesn't need a paragraph saying as much. Effort toward improving the ship pages is nonetheless appreciated. Feel free to contest the changes here if you wish. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] ([[User talk:Shiver|talk]]) 08:51, 24 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:51, 24 September 2013
I'm thinking of changing "Heavy X-Ray Laser" to "Heavy Laser". Ultronomicon regulars, do you agree or disagree? --Shiver 04:18, 29 January 2009 (CET)
- I'm curious as to what's your reasoning for wanting to change it. At first glance, I'd disagree mainly because the name "heavy X-ray laser" does come from a canon source - the 3DO spinning ship videos [1]. I don't think any of the other canon sources actually names or succinctly describes the laser. But depending on your reasoning, I might think differently. --Fyzixfighter 08:42, 29 January 2009 (CET)
- I am not downloading Real Player to look at that, but I'll take your word that "Heavy X-Ray Laser" is canon. I didn't even play the 3DO version, so this is news to me. My reason for bringing this up is that I thought it was an ugly-sounding, non-canonical name. If anyone else dislikes the name, here's the place to speak up I guess. --Shiver 06:45, 30 January 2009 (CET)
- Fair enough. In that light, I don't think it's an ugly name, but probably because I'm used to the phrase "x-ray laser" having worked on them. --Fyzixfighter 23:05, 31 January 2009 (CET)
Fourshade: I've removed most of your recent work on this page's Tactical Overview. 1) Chmmr vs Kohr-Ah and Chmmr vs Androsynth are particular match-ups that do not need to be covered in an overview, and doing so clogs up the page. 2) Chmmr is indeed not very good against the Sa-Matra, and the page doesn't need a paragraph saying as much. Effort toward improving the ship pages is nonetheless appreciated. Feel free to contest the changes here if you wish. --Shiver (talk) 08:51, 24 September 2013 (CEST)