Difference between revisions of "Talk:QuasiSpace"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Regarding assertions about the nature of QuasiSpace) |
(Agreeing) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The other contributions you've made to this article are excellent, but this particular assertion seems pretty unbased to me. I can see how one might comment on the subjective nature of physical perception (and how these factors limit our comprehension of QuasiSpace) but there doesn't seem to be enough evidence to support the hypothesis that QuasiSpace is a purely "mental" dimension. -[[User:Fadookie|Fadookie]] 10:10, 22 Nov 2004 (CET) | The other contributions you've made to this article are excellent, but this particular assertion seems pretty unbased to me. I can see how one might comment on the subjective nature of physical perception (and how these factors limit our comprehension of QuasiSpace) but there doesn't seem to be enough evidence to support the hypothesis that QuasiSpace is a purely "mental" dimension. -[[User:Fadookie|Fadookie]] 10:10, 22 Nov 2004 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I agree that this is pure fan-fiction. He '''again''' seems to be taking his own theories as fact. That's fine if you want to start a religion, but not if you're working on an encyclopedia. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 15:35, 22 Nov 2004 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 22 November 2004
"...QuasiSpace was an illusion, generated either by the minds of the Vindicator's crew or somehow created by the Arilou, and that the real structure of QuasiSpace obeys no physical laws and is some sort of purely "mental", "spiritual" or "pattern-based" dimension."
The other contributions you've made to this article are excellent, but this particular assertion seems pretty unbased to me. I can see how one might comment on the subjective nature of physical perception (and how these factors limit our comprehension of QuasiSpace) but there doesn't seem to be enough evidence to support the hypothesis that QuasiSpace is a purely "mental" dimension. -Fadookie 10:10, 22 Nov 2004 (CET)
- I agree that this is pure fan-fiction. He again seems to be taking his own theories as fact. That's fine if you want to start a religion, but not if you're working on an encyclopedia. -- SvdB 15:35, 22 Nov 2004 (CET)