Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eternal Doctrine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | I was under the impression that the Path of Now and Forever was the | + | I was under the impression that the Path of Now and Forever was the Kohr-Ah's way of life, as per this statement: |
''Our Doctrine, the Path of Now and Forever, shall be dominant | ''Our Doctrine, the Path of Now and Forever, shall be dominant | ||
| − | until the Kzer-Za win such a war.'' | + | ''until the Kzer-Za win such a war.'' |
Because of this, I become somewhat confused. -Aeonoris | Because of this, I become somewhat confused. -Aeonoris | ||
Latest revision as of 09:23, 22 January 2007
Can we get a list of the suspect statements that warrant the I{{Dubious}} tag here. It'd really help create a plan of attack for fixing the article and eventually removing that ignominious tag. --Fyzixfighter 21:48, 14 Nov 2005 (CET)
I was under the impression that the Path of Now and Forever was the Kohr-Ah's way of life, as per this statement:
Our Doctrine, the Path of Now and Forever, shall be dominant until the Kzer-Za win such a war.
Because of this, I become somewhat confused. -Aeonoris