Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha Cerenkov I"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Reverting. | Reverting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I felt the need to include some speculation, feel free to eviscerate this addition. As a side note, the hyperlink was included as to properly attribute the theories. [[User:Guizot|Guizot]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Sorry, Guizot, but I'll have to go for the 'evisceration'. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, and hope you stick around to further improve the Ultronomicon, I'm afraid this addition is just too far into fan fiction territory for this wiki. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 16:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Guizot: The relevant SCDB thread will probably be included in the thread catalogue I'm working on. --[[User:Zeracles|Zeracles]] 08:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Understood Svdb, I will strive not to make the same mistake again. Zeracles, if you do include that thread, I apologize for the tangents in it. --[[User:Guizot|Guizot]] 04:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:22, 27 June 2010
If we include the details of this story in every entry where it belongs -- ZEX, the Beast, the Shofixti Maidens, and the planet -- there will be six times too much space used for it. Information on the *planet itself* does not need to contain details about why ZEX died; people who want to know that can click right on it.
Keeping info separate between articles is the key to a hyperlinked encyclopedia and is the only way to prevent article sprawl.
Reverting.
- I felt the need to include some speculation, feel free to eviscerate this addition. As a side note, the hyperlink was included as to properly attribute the theories. Guizot
- Sorry, Guizot, but I'll have to go for the 'evisceration'. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, and hope you stick around to further improve the Ultronomicon, I'm afraid this addition is just too far into fan fiction territory for this wiki. — SvdB 16:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Guizot: The relevant SCDB thread will probably be included in the thread catalogue I'm working on. --Zeracles 08:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Understood Svdb, I will strive not to make the same mistake again. Zeracles, if you do include that thread, I apologize for the tangents in it. --Guizot 04:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)