Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of ships"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (reply) |
(Question posed) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'd be fine with that. The extra information does distinguish the list from the category, but even without those numbers (which do look kind of awkward in the list) the inclusion of the race and organization by race is enough to distinguish the list and warrant its existence IMO. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 23:42, 27 August 2007 (CEST) | :I'd be fine with that. The extra information does distinguish the list from the category, but even without those numbers (which do look kind of awkward in the list) the inclusion of the race and organization by race is enough to distinguish the list and warrant its existence IMO. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 23:42, 27 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | With the existence of [[Table of ship values]], isn't this a bit redundant? I know this entry predates the Table, but should we not rethink the existence of one of the two? --[[User:PsiPhi|PsiPhi]] 19:02, 15 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 15 October 2007
Wouldn't it be better if we removed the crew and cost info? Valaggar 18:43, 27 August 2007 (CEST)
- I'd be fine with that. The extra information does distinguish the list from the category, but even without those numbers (which do look kind of awkward in the list) the inclusion of the race and organization by race is enough to distinguish the list and warrant its existence IMO. --Fyzixfighter 23:42, 27 August 2007 (CEST)
With the existence of Table of ship values, isn't this a bit redundant? I know this entry predates the Table, but should we not rethink the existence of one of the two? --PsiPhi 19:02, 15 October 2007 (CEST)