Difference between revisions of "Talk:Supox"
(Green light) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[User:Mudlock|Mudlock]] 20:46, 22 Oct 2004 (CEST) | [[User:Mudlock|Mudlock]] 20:46, 22 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I always thought that the color of a star was basically a heat-map, not something that indicated the actual color of the light it emits. I don't think that there are any blue or green stars in reality. -[[User:Fadookie|Fadookie]] 20:56, 22 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 22 October 2004
I gotta say I admire the fulness of these reports who ever you are, 4.11.199.218! Outstanding!
--Dingus 05:51, 15 Oct 2004 (CEST)
note to self
Self, please edit this doc to be easier to read and more wiki-like. The content is incredible, but the layout needs work. Mmrnmhrm 22:28, 21 Oct 2004 (CEST) (don't mind me folks, I'm just leaving work now and I don't want to forget this when I get home.)
Green light
So, the article mentions that Root is a green star, and SEEMS to imply that this means the Supox have more light-energy available to use in their photosynthesis because of that fact. This is wrong; plants appear green because they take the LEAST amount of energy from green light (instead reflecting it back to an observer's eye).
Now, I may be reading to deeply into this, so I wanted to get a second opinion before changing things. Does anyone else see that implication?
Mudlock 20:46, 22 Oct 2004 (CEST)
I always thought that the color of a star was basically a heat-map, not something that indicated the actual color of the light it emits. I don't think that there are any blue or green stars in reality. -Fadookie 20:56, 22 Oct 2004 (CEST)