Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shiver"
(reply) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | :I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on [http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Talk:List_of_ships this page]. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the [[Blade]] page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
I'm curious on what graphics you did on Project 6014. In my opinion, that should have been Star Control 3. --[[User:Yuubuuinsteadofyou|Yuubuuinsteadofyou]] ([[User talk:Yuubuuinsteadofyou|talk]]) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (CEST) | I'm curious on what graphics you did on Project 6014. In my opinion, that should have been Star Control 3. --[[User:Yuubuuinsteadofyou|Yuubuuinsteadofyou]] ([[User talk:Yuubuuinsteadofyou|talk]]) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Not many. The weapon effects of the Chmmr Explorer, and the blue slave shields. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] ([[User talk:Shiver|talk]]) 08:40, 2 May 2013 (CEST) | ||
== Druuge == | == Druuge == | ||
Latest revision as of 06:40, 2 May 2013
"cc-by-sa-nc-2.5" is the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 license. As the images of the Ultronomicon may have a different license than the textual content, it is very important that the license is indicated. We really need a cc-by-sa-nc-2.5 template. — SvdB 11:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh! That answers that then. --Shiver 15:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
What's the deal with those deletions of ship to ship tactics? — SvdB 17:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on this page. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the Blade page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --Shiver 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm curious on what graphics you did on Project 6014. In my opinion, that should have been Star Control 3. --Yuubuuinsteadofyou (talk) 00:34, 25 April 2013 (CEST)
- Not many. The weapon effects of the Chmmr Explorer, and the blue slave shields. --Shiver (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2013 (CEST)
Druuge[edit]
I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true. Magic9mushroom 19:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- 450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --Shiver 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)