Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
m (Reverted edit of Nruuds, changed back to last version by Fyzixfighter) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
What is the status of the data on this page? Can it all be copied over the main wikipedia due to being free license or is it different to normal wikipedia? | What is the status of the data on this page? Can it all be copied over the main wikipedia due to being free license or is it different to normal wikipedia? | ||
| − | + | Online Gambling Casino. The most recognized information resource for reliable strategy guides and detailed rules for casino games. | |
| − | + | [http://online-gambling.viprape.com/ Online Gambling] | |
| − | The | ||
==Spam== | ==Spam== | ||
Revision as of 20:56, 1 March 2006
This warning isn't really the "first", "last", nor "only" spoiler warning. -- SvdB 13:24, 27 Oct 2004 (CEST)
Then call it The Spoiler Warning of Now and Forever. If you really think it's over the top, you can tone it down, but I think it gets the point accross well. Mmrnmhrm 17:30, 27 Oct 2004 (CEST)
What is the status of the data on this page? Can it all be copied over the main wikipedia due to being free license or is it different to normal wikipedia?
Online Gambling Casino. The most recognized information resource for reliable strategy guides and detailed rules for casino games. Online Gambling
Spam
As long as the spam is looking to delete the bottom-most section, it might as well be a one that's not so important.
- It's not that important actually. There's already a link to the copyright page on the bottom of every page here.
- — SvdB 11:12, 28 January 2006 (CET)
Anyone know games with contol as Star Control? Also looking for new idea about game-design new ship...
Suggestions
I suggest putting links to the other SC2-related websites on the mainpage, e.g. Forum http://uqm.stack.nl/forum, sf.net, bug-report-page, etc. -HaJo 22 February 2006 (CET)
- Well, there is already a wikilink to the Links page down in the lower left. --Fyzixfighter 01:47, 23 February 2006 (CET)
Perhaps this page should be protected since it sees a lot of vandalism?
--Luminar 21:53, 24 February 2006 (CET)
- That wouldn't help. They'd just pick another page. This way at least it's easy to see, and it's better that this page is spammed than some article page.
- — SvdB 05:43, 25 February 2006 (CET)