Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha Wolf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(agree) |
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (it's been a week...) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I second that. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 13:30, 18 July 2006 (CEST) | :I second that. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 13:30, 18 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Alright, it's been a week. Unless there's further objections, I'm going to take care of this. Just in case, I'll change these as redirects to Wolf (thus preserving the old pages). Eventually we could simply delete them but I do want to play this a bit safe at first. If there be any opposed, speak now or forever let your objections gnaw at your insides. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 07:59, 26 July 2006 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:59, 26 July 2006
No offense intended towards the creators of these articles...but are Alpha Wolf and/or its planets notable for any reason? They're not mentioned in any dialog nor related to any event. At best one of the planets is a good source of life data near sol, but it doesn't make the top twenty overall. While I think that I fall somewhere in the middle of the spectrum on the creation of articles for every constellation, star, and planet, I'm gonna have to draw the line at this measure of minutia. If anything, let's first create pages for locations that are notable either from gameplay or dialog. So can we get rid of these - there's nothing in them that can't be recreated in an instant. --Fyzixfighter 07:27, 18 July 2006 (CEST)
- I second that. — SvdB 13:30, 18 July 2006 (CEST)
- Alright, it's been a week. Unless there's further objections, I'm going to take care of this. Just in case, I'll change these as redirects to Wolf (thus preserving the old pages). Eventually we could simply delete them but I do want to play this a bit safe at first. If there be any opposed, speak now or forever let your objections gnaw at your insides. --Fyzixfighter 07:59, 26 July 2006 (CEST)