Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eternal Doctrine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (request for clarification) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we get a list of the suspect statements that warrant the <nowiki>I{{Dubious}}</nowiki> tag here. It'd really help create a plan of attack for fixing the article and eventually removing that ignominious tag. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 21:48, 14 Nov 2005 (CET) | Can we get a list of the suspect statements that warrant the <nowiki>I{{Dubious}}</nowiki> tag here. It'd really help create a plan of attack for fixing the article and eventually removing that ignominious tag. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 21:48, 14 Nov 2005 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I was under the impression that the Path of Now and Forever was the Kzer-Za's way of life, as per this statement: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Our Doctrine, the Path of Now and Forever, shall be dominant | ||
| + | until the Kzer-Za win such a war. | ||
| + | '' | ||
| + | Because of this, I become somewhat confused. -Aeonoris | ||
Revision as of 07:41, 20 December 2006
Can we get a list of the suspect statements that warrant the I{{Dubious}} tag here. It'd really help create a plan of attack for fixing the article and eventually removing that ignominious tag. --Fyzixfighter 21:48, 14 Nov 2005 (CET)
I was under the impression that the Path of Now and Forever was the Kzer-Za's way of life, as per this statement:
Our Doctrine, the Path of Now and Forever, shall be dominant until the Kzer-Za win such a war. Because of this, I become somewhat confused. -Aeonoris