Difference between revisions of "Gamma Serpentis I"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edit of 83.149.19.6, changed back to last version by Valaggar) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | is there an Editors' Page to discuss changes publicly? if not, can we make one? -[[User:SamYeager|SamYeager]] 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST) | |
+ | :Go right ahead. I suggest you name it as it is named in the Wikipedia. It might be a good idea to link it from the main page too. Or perhaps from "Community portal". -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] | ||
− | |||
− | + | should we make links to go upwards through menus of items (ie. make a link to "List of Races" from the "Humans" page)? it would make editing many pages easier since we no longer have to backtrack through several pages of blanked-out previews to get to the category we were at. -[[User:SamYeager|SamYeager]] 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST) | |
+ | :I think the "Categories" concept suffices for this. Put for instance <nowiki>[[Category:Races]]</nowiki> on the bottom of a page to place it in a category. See [[Special:Categories]] for all categories so far. | ||
+ | :Also, you can select "What links here" in the toolbox on the left. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | [[ | + | for the WantedPages, do we view pages that have just 1 link to them? it'd be a good way to find misspelled or misdirected links. |
− | [[ | + | :I didn't write the wiki software. It's not a high priority for me to find out where in the code this is handled, and change it. |
+ | ::Minor fix. See [[1 Link Pages]] from [[Special:MainPage|Main Page]] -[[User:SamYeager|SamYeager]] 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST) | ||
+ | :::I guess it will do as a temporary solution. --[[User:Svdb|SvdB]] | ||
+ | ::::I have changed the source to show 1 link pages, and removed your page. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Vandalism == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is there a more effective way to protect the wiki from spammers and vandals other than just ip-banning them and reverting their changes? -[[User:Fadookie|Fadookie]] 11:00, 23 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
+ | :That's how it is still done on the Wikipedia. Another possibility is to require contributors to make an account, with email verification. You could protect against spam bots by asking them to copy a number from an image when they contribute (but MediaWiki can't do that yet). | ||
+ | :Something else we could do is lock specific pages (like the main page), but I don't want to do that until that page has reached a more permanent form. Against non-bots you could put up some idle threat on the home page like "the last person who vandalised a page on this site got his computer hacked and cleared." :) -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 11:14, 23 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
+ | ::What are your thoughts on creating some kind of blacklist like that described [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Anti-spam_Features here] and [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/SpamBlacklist_extension here]? It might be able to cut down on some of this spam since many of the spam-edits are so similar. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 06:13, 9 January 2006 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::I would actually expect that my added checkbox would do the trick. I suspect there's something wrong in my implementation, as I find it unlikely that someone who would go to the trouble of adapting his scripts to work for the Ultronomicon wouldn't notice that all links have rel=nofollow. I'll investigate further later, but I don't have much time right now. |
Revision as of 14:30, 8 July 2007
is there an Editors' Page to discuss changes publicly? if not, can we make one? -SamYeager 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- Go right ahead. I suggest you name it as it is named in the Wikipedia. It might be a good idea to link it from the main page too. Or perhaps from "Community portal". -- SvdB
should we make links to go upwards through menus of items (ie. make a link to "List of Races" from the "Humans" page)? it would make editing many pages easier since we no longer have to backtrack through several pages of blanked-out previews to get to the category we were at. -SamYeager 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- I think the "Categories" concept suffices for this. Put for instance [[Category:Races]] on the bottom of a page to place it in a category. See Special:Categories for all categories so far.
- Also, you can select "What links here" in the toolbox on the left.
for the WantedPages, do we view pages that have just 1 link to them? it'd be a good way to find misspelled or misdirected links.
- I didn't write the wiki software. It's not a high priority for me to find out where in the code this is handled, and change it.
- Minor fix. See 1 Link Pages from Main Page -SamYeager 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST)
- I guess it will do as a temporary solution. --SvdB
- I have changed the source to show 1 link pages, and removed your page.
- I guess it will do as a temporary solution. --SvdB
- Minor fix. See 1 Link Pages from Main Page -SamYeager 10:05, 28 Sep 2004 (CEST)
Vandalism
Is there a more effective way to protect the wiki from spammers and vandals other than just ip-banning them and reverting their changes? -Fadookie 11:00, 23 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- That's how it is still done on the Wikipedia. Another possibility is to require contributors to make an account, with email verification. You could protect against spam bots by asking them to copy a number from an image when they contribute (but MediaWiki can't do that yet).
- Something else we could do is lock specific pages (like the main page), but I don't want to do that until that page has reached a more permanent form. Against non-bots you could put up some idle threat on the home page like "the last person who vandalised a page on this site got his computer hacked and cleared." :) -- SvdB 11:14, 23 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- What are your thoughts on creating some kind of blacklist like that described here and here? It might be able to cut down on some of this spam since many of the spam-edits are so similar. --Fyzixfighter 06:13, 9 January 2006 (CET)
- I would actually expect that my added checkbox would do the trick. I suspect there's something wrong in my implementation, as I find it unlikely that someone who would go to the trouble of adapting his scripts to work for the Ultronomicon wouldn't notice that all links have rel=nofollow. I'll investigate further later, but I don't have much time right now.