Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second War"

From Ultronomicon
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(get rid of second war then?)
 
(reply)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Following from Valaggar pointing out that "Second War" is a non-canonical term, it sounds like we could just get rid of this page - looks like it could be replaced by Category:In-game events. There are about thirty or forty pages which link to "Second War", these could then read as links saying "events of Star Control II" or something like that. But at some point it might still be good to have a less diffuse article tying it together. Any other ideas (or just stuff I've missed)?
 
Following from Valaggar pointing out that "Second War" is a non-canonical term, it sounds like we could just get rid of this page - looks like it could be replaced by Category:In-game events. There are about thirty or forty pages which link to "Second War", these could then read as links saying "events of Star Control II" or something like that. But at some point it might still be good to have a less diffuse article tying it together. Any other ideas (or just stuff I've missed)?
 +
 +
:I think in most places we could change it to "events of Star Control II", or something similar depending on the context, or removed entirely if it doesn't really add anything to the article. As for what to do with this page itself, I'd say merge any relevant information over to [[SC2]] in some fashion. I've got some time now, so I'll start whittling away at those linking pages... --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 03:40, 28 September 2007 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 01:40, 28 September 2007

Following from Valaggar pointing out that "Second War" is a non-canonical term, it sounds like we could just get rid of this page - looks like it could be replaced by Category:In-game events. There are about thirty or forty pages which link to "Second War", these could then read as links saying "events of Star Control II" or something like that. But at some point it might still be good to have a less diffuse article tying it together. Any other ideas (or just stuff I've missed)?

I think in most places we could change it to "events of Star Control II", or something similar depending on the context, or removed entirely if it doesn't really add anything to the article. As for what to do with this page itself, I'd say merge any relevant information over to SC2 in some fashion. I've got some time now, so I'll start whittling away at those linking pages... --Fyzixfighter 03:40, 28 September 2007 (CEST)