Difference between revisions of "Talk:Orz"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply to question) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It may not be an accepted theory, but I remember (from some years ago) that Orz always refers to itself a single entity. Would anyone mind if I change all the self references here to singular forms? | It may not be an accepted theory, but I remember (from some years ago) that Orz always refers to itself a single entity. Would anyone mind if I change all the self references here to singular forms? | ||
:Seems like a good idea. It would make sense to elaborate on this fact in the article too. Also, it may be possible that there are other entities of its kind. - [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 23:02, 5 Oct 2004 (CEST) | :Seems like a good idea. It would make sense to elaborate on this fact in the article too. Also, it may be possible that there are other entities of its kind. - [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 23:02, 5 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whoever 147.72.117.19 is, that last edit for Orz was awesome! Much clearer. It's they way I was going to make it if I had had the time. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Mmrnmhrm|Mmrnmhrm]] 17:04, 7 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 7 October 2004
It may not be an accepted theory, but I remember (from some years ago) that Orz always refers to itself a single entity. Would anyone mind if I change all the self references here to singular forms?
- Seems like a good idea. It would make sense to elaborate on this fact in the article too. Also, it may be possible that there are other entities of its kind. - SvdB 23:02, 5 Oct 2004 (CEST)
Whoever 147.72.117.19 is, that last edit for Orz was awesome! Much clearer. It's they way I was going to make it if I had had the time.
Mmrnmhrm 17:04, 7 Oct 2004 (CEST)