Difference between revisions of "User talk:CyberSoul"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Gem worlds) |
(reply to Shiver) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Gem worlds getting their own pages? You know, that's not a bad idea! Welcome to Ultronomicon, newcomer. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 04:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | Gem worlds getting their own pages? You know, that's not a bad idea! Welcome to Ultronomicon, newcomer. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 04:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Thanks for the welcome and support. I saw a partial list of the gem worlds in a walkthrough and figured out how to extract the full list (after a while!). At first, I naively searched high and low for static data somewhere in the codebase :) Plus IIRC, the top 21 mineral planets are all gem planets! Do you like the presentation format? I was thinking about using it in a couple more pages, and it would be easier to change now rather than later. Once the format is ready, I would like to add the same data to the rainbow world page, as some of them are quite hostile while others are calm. [[User:CyberSoul|CyberSoul]] 04:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:58, 26 March 2011
Gem worlds getting their own pages? You know, that's not a bad idea! Welcome to Ultronomicon, newcomer. --Shiver 04:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome and support. I saw a partial list of the gem worlds in a walkthrough and figured out how to extract the full list (after a while!). At first, I naively searched high and low for static data somewhere in the codebase :) Plus IIRC, the top 21 mineral planets are all gem planets! Do you like the presentation format? I was thinking about using it in a couple more pages, and it would be easier to change now rather than later. Once the format is ready, I would like to add the same data to the rainbow world page, as some of them are quite hostile while others are calm. CyberSoul 04:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)