Difference between revisions of "MediaWiki talk:Editsection"
(Forget about it...) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Can you be more clear? What goes wrong, where? | Can you be more clear? What goes wrong, where? | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Won't clear:right place all following text below the item? I don't think that's the functionality we want. The purpose of floating objects is to have the following text wrap around them. Everything looks fine to me. Where do you see it doing something it's not supposed to? [[User:Mmrnmhrm|Mmrnmhrm]] 00:12, 30 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Please disregard this request; I was trying to pre-empt people saying that the text didn't flow correctly, but people seem to think it looks OK as-is. Also, I'd forgotten about the UrQuanNav boxes; they require the current style in order to layout the page correctly. | ||
| − | + | --[[User:Nic|Nic]] 08:06, 30 Oct 2004 (CEST) | |
| + | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 06:06, 30 October 2004
Page elements that have "float:right" set will cause this element to be inappropriately placed. Add a "clear:right" to its style (or the stylesheet it uses) to fix it.
I don't understand.[edit]
Can you be more clear? What goes wrong, where?
Won't clear:right place all following text below the item? I don't think that's the functionality we want. The purpose of floating objects is to have the following text wrap around them. Everything looks fine to me. Where do you see it doing something it's not supposed to? Mmrnmhrm 00:12, 30 Oct 2004 (CEST)
Please disregard this request; I was trying to pre-empt people saying that the text didn't flow correctly, but people seem to think it looks OK as-is. Also, I'd forgotten about the UrQuanNav boxes; they require the current style in order to layout the page correctly.
--Nic 08:06, 30 Oct 2004 (CEST)