Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alpha Pavonis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (reply) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Good questions - I was debating reverting the edit since the larger majority of star pages don't keep track of this. Ideally, IMO the planet page is where this should be indicated. The earliest instance that I can find of someone including "harbors life" is on [[Alpha Andromedae]] back in early 2006. Later in 2006, it was included on some of the [[Centauri]] stars. However, the more common pattern has been to indicate significant artifacts/points of interest on the star page. IMO this does not necessarily include whether or not a planet contains life. I do see why someone would find it useful to put this information here - a quick reason for visiting or not visiting (or perhaps visiting and taking off in panic at the sight of a swarm of Fungal Squids) a planet. However, I don't like this reason since we don't have pages for every single star - if we did have pages for all the stars, then I might be more amenable to this. | :Good questions - I was debating reverting the edit since the larger majority of star pages don't keep track of this. Ideally, IMO the planet page is where this should be indicated. The earliest instance that I can find of someone including "harbors life" is on [[Alpha Andromedae]] back in early 2006. Later in 2006, it was included on some of the [[Centauri]] stars. However, the more common pattern has been to indicate significant artifacts/points of interest on the star page. IMO this does not necessarily include whether or not a planet contains life. I do see why someone would find it useful to put this information here - a quick reason for visiting or not visiting (or perhaps visiting and taking off in panic at the sight of a swarm of Fungal Squids) a planet. However, I don't like this reason since we don't have pages for every single star - if we did have pages for all the stars, then I might be more amenable to this. | ||
:One alternative that would try to address this need would be to create a '''Table/List of planets with biology''' or something similar (personally, I prefer this to tracking "Life" with the star pages). We could then include a number of bio units, and maybe even include the icons of the present life-forms. I think this would be more useful than indicating on the star pages which planets have life since it would be a truly comprehensive list. Another alternative, if people think that the star pages should track "Life" would be to use a standard icon rather than words so that it's easier on the eyes and distracts less from the more essential information. I have no idea what icon would be appropriate though. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 01:26, 24 April 2009 (CEST) | :One alternative that would try to address this need would be to create a '''Table/List of planets with biology''' or something similar (personally, I prefer this to tracking "Life" with the star pages). We could then include a number of bio units, and maybe even include the icons of the present life-forms. I think this would be more useful than indicating on the star pages which planets have life since it would be a truly comprehensive list. Another alternative, if people think that the star pages should track "Life" would be to use a standard icon rather than words so that it's easier on the eyes and distracts less from the more essential information. I have no idea what icon would be appropriate though. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 01:26, 24 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::A list of planets with lifeforms sounds best to me. I'd prefer to remove all references to lifeforms on the system pages, and will do so with your permission. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 01:55, 24 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 23:55, 23 April 2009
"(contains Life)" was a recent edit to this page. The planet does. Is there a proper way to annotate this? Are star pages even supposed to keep track of this? --Shiver 23:18, 23 April 2009 (CEST)
- Good questions - I was debating reverting the edit since the larger majority of star pages don't keep track of this. Ideally, IMO the planet page is where this should be indicated. The earliest instance that I can find of someone including "harbors life" is on Alpha Andromedae back in early 2006. Later in 2006, it was included on some of the Centauri stars. However, the more common pattern has been to indicate significant artifacts/points of interest on the star page. IMO this does not necessarily include whether or not a planet contains life. I do see why someone would find it useful to put this information here - a quick reason for visiting or not visiting (or perhaps visiting and taking off in panic at the sight of a swarm of Fungal Squids) a planet. However, I don't like this reason since we don't have pages for every single star - if we did have pages for all the stars, then I might be more amenable to this.
- One alternative that would try to address this need would be to create a Table/List of planets with biology or something similar (personally, I prefer this to tracking "Life" with the star pages). We could then include a number of bio units, and maybe even include the icons of the present life-forms. I think this would be more useful than indicating on the star pages which planets have life since it would be a truly comprehensive list. Another alternative, if people think that the star pages should track "Life" would be to use a standard icon rather than words so that it's easier on the eyes and distracts less from the more essential information. I have no idea what icon would be appropriate though. --Fyzixfighter 01:26, 24 April 2009 (CEST)
- A list of planets with lifeforms sounds best to me. I'd prefer to remove all references to lifeforms on the system pages, and will do so with your permission. --Shiver 01:55, 24 April 2009 (CEST)