Difference between revisions of "Talk:ComSim Central"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(my view) |
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (thanks) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"data bank" is not a name; it's a description. It is a normal English word, be it a relatively recent one. If ComSim is used in reference to the same databank, I think it would be a better name for this page. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 15:57, 7 April 2007 (CEST) | "data bank" is not a name; it's a description. It is a normal English word, be it a relatively recent one. If ComSim is used in reference to the same databank, I think it would be a better name for this page. — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 15:57, 7 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Allright. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thanks Val. I've tweaked the article a bit to put it first in the context of SC1 lore using the scant manual description, and expanded it to include the whole aspect of Practice mode, but for the most part kept the original article. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 18:08, 7 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 7 April 2007
A better title for this would probably be ComSim Central, as it seems to be referred to in the SC1 manual, pp 13-14. I seem to recall the name ComSim showing up in the game, but it's been awhile so I could be imagining. Unless of course there's another reference to this with the specific name "DataBank"? --Fyzixfighter 10:45, 7 April 2007 (CEST)
While loading a Databank image, it says "Accessing Starship Databank". Valaggar 11:02, 7 April 2007 (CEST)
"data bank" is not a name; it's a description. It is a normal English word, be it a relatively recent one. If ComSim is used in reference to the same databank, I think it would be a better name for this page. — SvdB 15:57, 7 April 2007 (CEST)
Allright.
- Thanks Val. I've tweaked the article a bit to put it first in the context of SC1 lore using the scant manual description, and expanded it to include the whole aspect of Practice mode, but for the most part kept the original article. --Fyzixfighter 18:08, 7 April 2007 (CEST)