Difference between revisions of "Talk:Earth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Ah, oops. Didn't notice those. No, I think there's no need to state the number of satellites for planets from the Solar System. It's superfluous and looks ugly. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 16:35, 15 October 2007 (CEST) | :Ah, oops. Didn't notice those. No, I think there's no need to state the number of satellites for planets from the Solar System. It's superfluous and looks ugly. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 16:35, 15 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thanks Valaggar. I'm glad we came to an agreement. I figured listing the number of sats. and then their names was a bit redundant. Having Luna with its type in parens. seems OK to me since (at this point) Luna has its own page (the other moons were folded into their planet page given their minor importance to the game play itself). --[[User:PsiPhi|PsiPhi]] 17:03, 15 October 2007 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 15 October 2007
PlanetBox[edit]
Valaggar, editing the listing for Luna in the PlanetBox is all well and good, but what about consistency with Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune? I was trying for some consistency. Should we not then edit those planet's moon listings to match, so that Jupiter says "4 satellites" and then lists them? Just curious. --PsiPhi 16:18, 15 October 2007 (CEST)
- Ah, oops. Didn't notice those. No, I think there's no need to state the number of satellites for planets from the Solar System. It's superfluous and looks ugly. Valaggar 16:35, 15 October 2007 (CEST)
- Thanks Valaggar. I'm glad we came to an agreement. I figured listing the number of sats. and then their names was a bit redundant. Having Luna with its type in parens. seems OK to me since (at this point) Luna has its own page (the other moons were folded into their planet page given their minor importance to the game play itself). --PsiPhi 17:03, 15 October 2007 (CEST)