Difference between revisions of "Talk:Furnace"

From Ultronomicon
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(clarification)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)
 
:Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -[[User:Fadookie|Fadookie]] 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)
 +
::We'll see. If it doesn't, I'll file a bug report. - [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 23:36, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)
  
 
:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137|130.58.225.137]]
 
:I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.[[User:130.58.225.137|130.58.225.137]]
 +
 +
::That was the idea. I was talking about an automatic redirect, not a reference. It doesn't hurt having one. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]]

Latest revision as of 22:36, 2 February 2005

I think this should be a redirect to Mauler#Secondary. Opinions? -- SvdB 10:07, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)

Sounds fine, but as far as I know MediaWiki does not support redirects to specific sections. -Fadookie 06:23, 14 Jan 2005 (CET)
We'll see. If it doesn't, I'll file a bug report. - SvdB 23:36, 2 Feb 2005 (CET)
I think this shouldn't be an article at all, given that it's never going to be more than two or three lines long. It should be part of the Druuge or Mauler article. People are getting way too stub-happy -- we ought to have a guideline that says if you can't make a complete article out of something you shouldn't make one, since we're getting tons and tons of stupid little one-paragraph articles that repeat info that already exists.130.58.225.137
That was the idea. I was talking about an automatic redirect, not a reference. It doesn't hurt having one. -- SvdB