Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Flagship Modules"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
(Sign off while logged in) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:In Wikipedia, categories and list pages are used next to eachother. I'm not sure what their reasoning is, but it seems to me that a Category page is more of an index, while a "list of" page is more of a table of contents. A "list of" page does not have to be sorted on alphabet, and can have additional comments. Not just as introductionary message, but also like "also known as Fusion Thruster" within parenthesis. - [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 22:44, 6 Oct 2004 (CEST) | :In Wikipedia, categories and list pages are used next to eachother. I'm not sure what their reasoning is, but it seems to me that a Category page is more of an index, while a "list of" page is more of a table of contents. A "list of" page does not have to be sorted on alphabet, and can have additional comments. Not just as introductionary message, but also like "also known as Fusion Thruster" within parenthesis. - [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 22:44, 6 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
::It's a lot more work to maintain lists. Many of the list pages are already out of date and anyone who adds something that ''should'' go on them won't necessarily know to, or want to bother. I think that the use of list pages on Wikipedia is because Categories are a relatively new feature and they keep the lists around for backwards compatibility and because no one has bothered to get rid of them yet. | ::It's a lot more work to maintain lists. Many of the list pages are already out of date and anyone who adds something that ''should'' go on them won't necessarily know to, or want to bother. I think that the use of list pages on Wikipedia is because Categories are a relatively new feature and they keep the lists around for backwards compatibility and because no one has bothered to get rid of them yet. | ||
| − | :::Well, lists have their own advantages, as I mentioned above. As for lists getting out of date, it only takes one person to notice and fix it. Usually though, the link on the list page exists before the page does. Which is another thing you can't do with Categories, while it is useful, as it stimulates people to contribute. Besides, at some point there will be no pages left to add within a list. :) - [[User: | + | :::Well, lists have their own advantages, as I mentioned above. As for lists getting out of date, it only takes one person to notice and fix it. Usually though, the link on the list page exists before the page does. Which is another thing you can't do with Categories, while it is useful, as it stimulates people to contribute. Besides, at some point there will be no pages left to add within a list. :) - [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 05:25, 7 Oct 2004 (CEST) |
Revision as of 03:25, 7 October 2004
Shouldn't this page be replaced with an automatic Category page? I'm working on that now.
- In Wikipedia, categories and list pages are used next to eachother. I'm not sure what their reasoning is, but it seems to me that a Category page is more of an index, while a "list of" page is more of a table of contents. A "list of" page does not have to be sorted on alphabet, and can have additional comments. Not just as introductionary message, but also like "also known as Fusion Thruster" within parenthesis. - SvdB 22:44, 6 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- It's a lot more work to maintain lists. Many of the list pages are already out of date and anyone who adds something that should go on them won't necessarily know to, or want to bother. I think that the use of list pages on Wikipedia is because Categories are a relatively new feature and they keep the lists around for backwards compatibility and because no one has bothered to get rid of them yet.
- Well, lists have their own advantages, as I mentioned above. As for lists getting out of date, it only takes one person to notice and fix it. Usually though, the link on the list page exists before the page does. Which is another thing you can't do with Categories, while it is useful, as it stimulates people to contribute. Besides, at some point there will be no pages left to add within a list. :) - SvdB 05:25, 7 Oct 2004 (CEST)
- It's a lot more work to maintain lists. Many of the list pages are already out of date and anyone who adds something that should go on them won't necessarily know to, or want to bother. I think that the use of list pages on Wikipedia is because Categories are a relatively new feature and they keep the lists around for backwards compatibility and because no one has bothered to get rid of them yet.