Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of characters"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (comment on recent additions) |
(including race names?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I went searching through the dialogs for new characters/people and came up with these additions. These don't include the (Utwig) Great Proctor or the Mycon personalities since I didn't know how to categorize them. I've also left them unlinked to start out with in case any of these are so incidental that all they warrant is mention in this list (and also because I can't think too clearly now - I should really go to sleep). --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 10:40, 11 Nov 2005 (CET) | I went searching through the dialogs for new characters/people and came up with these additions. These don't include the (Utwig) Great Proctor or the Mycon personalities since I didn't know how to categorize them. I've also left them unlinked to start out with in case any of these are so incidental that all they warrant is mention in this list (and also because I can't think too clearly now - I should really go to sleep). --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 10:40, 11 Nov 2005 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == including race names? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adding the races of these individuals in between parentheses: good idea or bad idea? — [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 03:08, 2 June 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 01:08, 2 June 2007
Is there a reason why this being used instead of the Category:Characters page?
- See Talk:List of SIS Modules. - SvdB
I went searching through the dialogs for new characters/people and came up with these additions. These don't include the (Utwig) Great Proctor or the Mycon personalities since I didn't know how to categorize them. I've also left them unlinked to start out with in case any of these are so incidental that all they warrant is mention in this list (and also because I can't think too clearly now - I should really go to sleep). --Fyzixfighter 10:40, 11 Nov 2005 (CET)
including race names?
Adding the races of these individuals in between parentheses: good idea or bad idea? — SvdB 03:08, 2 June 2007 (CEST)