Difference between revisions of "Talk:Moon Base"

From Ultronomicon
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Please do not make assumptions and clearly mark speculation as such. Fwiffo clearly mentioned they built the moon base to trick the humans, not their superiors. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 16:35, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST)
+
Please do not make assumptions and clearly mark speculation as such. Fwiffo clearly mentioned they built the moon base to trick the humans, not their superiors. Similarly, the bulldozers pushing around dirt does not have to be done to fake "building projects". It could have been mining. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 16:35, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
The Moon Base is an artifact you can take with you. The text needs to reflect this. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 08:21, 9 Oct 2004 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
== Both? ==
 +
 
 +
Articles can be in multiple categories.  Should it also be a place, or do we want to make a "Luna" (or Sol 3.1) page?  [[User:Mmrnmhrm|Mmrnmhrm]] 08:21, 10 Oct 2004 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
== Not really a location ==
 +
 
 +
I have trouble seeing it as a location in space, as it is appearantly rather portable. If you're going to call this a location, you might as well call the SIS a location, and captain Fwiffo's ship. I'd personally much prefer a page "Luna". -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 22:45, 10 Oct 2004 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
::No, it is a fixed station -- it disappears from the map because you scrap all the equipment inside it and take it with you, and are therefore presumably no longer interested in it, but the physical structure is probably still there.

Latest revision as of 05:24, 16 October 2004

Please do not make assumptions and clearly mark speculation as such. Fwiffo clearly mentioned they built the moon base to trick the humans, not their superiors. Similarly, the bulldozers pushing around dirt does not have to be done to fake "building projects". It could have been mining. -- SvdB 16:35, 5 Sep 2004 (CEST)

The Moon Base is an artifact you can take with you. The text needs to reflect this. -- SvdB 08:21, 9 Oct 2004 (CEST)

Both?[edit]

Articles can be in multiple categories. Should it also be a place, or do we want to make a "Luna" (or Sol 3.1) page? Mmrnmhrm 08:21, 10 Oct 2004 (CEST)

Not really a location[edit]

I have trouble seeing it as a location in space, as it is appearantly rather portable. If you're going to call this a location, you might as well call the SIS a location, and captain Fwiffo's ship. I'd personally much prefer a page "Luna". -- SvdB 22:45, 10 Oct 2004 (CEST)

No, it is a fixed station -- it disappears from the map because you scrap all the equipment inside it and take it with you, and are therefore presumably no longer interested in it, but the physical structure is probably still there.