Difference between revisions of "Talk:Slylandro Timekeeping"

From Ultronomicon
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(i've changed my mind)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think that this topic merits it's own page since this is the only case of an alien time standard within the game. I also think that the historical comparison between the human and Slylandro dates for events is pretty interesting. I rounded all the numbers to keep three sig-digs since the rotation is 14.2 earth hours in the code. The article is still rough, I'm still not happy with the table, so any help to tighten up the presentation would be much appreciated. Thanks to [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] for the original forum thread that gave us the conversion rates. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 21:49, 1 Nov 2005 (CET)
 
I think that this topic merits it's own page since this is the only case of an alien time standard within the game. I also think that the historical comparison between the human and Slylandro dates for events is pretty interesting. I rounded all the numbers to keep three sig-digs since the rotation is 14.2 earth hours in the code. The article is still rough, I'm still not happy with the table, so any help to tighten up the presentation would be much appreciated. Thanks to [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] for the original forum thread that gave us the conversion rates. --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 21:49, 1 Nov 2005 (CET)
 +
 +
:Yes, I know what I said over a year ago, but the more I think on this, the more I want to merge this info back into the [[Source]] article as a subsection. Any objections or thoughts? --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 09:47, 1 May 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 07:47, 1 May 2007

I think that this topic merits it's own page since this is the only case of an alien time standard within the game. I also think that the historical comparison between the human and Slylandro dates for events is pretty interesting. I rounded all the numbers to keep three sig-digs since the rotation is 14.2 earth hours in the code. The article is still rough, I'm still not happy with the table, so any help to tighten up the presentation would be much appreciated. Thanks to SvdB for the original forum thread that gave us the conversion rates. --Fyzixfighter 21:49, 1 Nov 2005 (CET)

Yes, I know what I said over a year ago, but the more I think on this, the more I want to merge this info back into the Source article as a subsection. Any objections or thoughts? --Fyzixfighter 09:47, 1 May 2007 (CEST)