Difference between revisions of "Template talk:PlanetBox"
(what I think about it) |
Fyzixfighter (talk | contribs) (on using the template for category inclusion) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I used to think those planet stats weren't useful enough to include in the Ultronomicon, but this way they can be included while staying unobtrusive. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 14:08, 27 Jun 2005 (CEST) | I used to think those planet stats weren't useful enough to include in the Ultronomicon, but this way they can be included while staying unobtrusive. -- [[User:Svdb|SvdB]] 14:08, 27 Jun 2005 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Category inclusion== | ||
| + | While I think it's a nice feature of templates, there are some side effects that we need to deal with. For example, this now includes the [[Ultronomicon:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] in [[:Category:Planets]], which is slightly misleading. Also, be sure to use <nowiki><includeonly></includeonly></nowiki> so the template doesn't show up in the category. The easiest solution imho is to move the usage guidelines for the various textboxes to the template talk pages w/ links from the MoS, or just not use the inclusion trick at all. Thoughts? --[[User:Fyzixfighter|Fyzixfighter]] 09:59, 23 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 07:59, 23 May 2006
I was inspired by Jacius' wiki version of Mmrnmhrm's RaceBox and Chimmera's planet tables, I decided to make a PlanetBox to hold the stats of planets. What do you think?
I used to think those planet stats weren't useful enough to include in the Ultronomicon, but this way they can be included while staying unobtrusive. -- SvdB 14:08, 27 Jun 2005 (CEST)
Category inclusion
While I think it's a nice feature of templates, there are some side effects that we need to deal with. For example, this now includes the Manual of Style in Category:Planets, which is slightly misleading. Also, be sure to use <includeonly></includeonly> so the template doesn't show up in the category. The easiest solution imho is to move the usage guidelines for the various textboxes to the template talk pages w/ links from the MoS, or just not use the inclusion trick at all. Thoughts? --Fyzixfighter 09:59, 23 May 2006 (CEST)