Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mmrnmhrm"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Mmrnmhrm|Mmrnmhrm]] 15:51, 8 Oct 2004 (CEST) | [[User:Mmrnmhrm|Mmrnmhrm]] 15:51, 8 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | General open discussion: Locations, I think there's enough to warrant a new category. Between stars, planets and costellations (which could even be subcategories) there's more than enough. (You can all thank the "uncategorized pages" link above for this revelation.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we bother? I know that some people have been actively deleting links to specific stars or planets for fear that we'll end up with a bloated catalog of space. Even if that happens (which I doubt it will) would that be so bad? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discussion welcome. Bring it on! | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Mmrnmhrm|Mmrnmhrm]] 17:23, 8 Oct 2004 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 15:23, 8 October 2004
I upgraded the mediawiki software. Special:Uncategorizedpages should work now.
Awesome! Thanks. It's a very useful tool.
Mmrnmhrm 15:51, 8 Oct 2004 (CEST)
General open discussion: Locations, I think there's enough to warrant a new category. Between stars, planets and costellations (which could even be subcategories) there's more than enough. (You can all thank the "uncategorized pages" link above for this revelation.)
Should we bother? I know that some people have been actively deleting links to specific stars or planets for fear that we'll end up with a bloated catalog of space. Even if that happens (which I doubt it will) would that be so bad?
Discussion welcome. Bring it on!
Mmrnmhrm 17:23, 8 Oct 2004 (CEST)