Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shiver"
Videogamer13 (talk | contribs) (→Druuge) |
Videogamer13 (talk | contribs) (→Druuge) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC) | :450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they | + | I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they are the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --[[User:Videogamer13|Videogamer13]] 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:16, 22 December 2010
"cc-by-sa-nc-2.5" is the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 license. As the images of the Ultronomicon may have a different license than the textual content, it is very important that the license is indicated. We really need a cc-by-sa-nc-2.5 template. — SvdB 11:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh! That answers that then. --Shiver 15:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
What's the deal with those deletions of ship to ship tactics? — SvdB 17:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm doing something FyzixFighter suggested over a year ago, which Zeracles seconded and I happen to agree with. See "Tactical overview sections" on this page. To reiterate, the plan is to keep the Tactical Overview sections but remove specific ship-to-ship tactics which tend to be highly subjective. See the Blade page for a good example of the direction I'm trying to take with the ship pages. --Shiver 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Druuge
I'm the one who edited the "this claim is false" on the Druuge page to "actually true". Obviously, I don't want to get embroiled in an edit war, but 450 RU is more than even a Dreadnought wreck, and is only bettered by Slylandro Probes. It is rather spectacular for salvage, and it is a significant deviation from normal ship salvage equations. A deviation which only the Druuge tell you about. I think that in this case, since the Trader DOES give a huge amount of RU on salvage compared to its point value, that we should mark the Druuge assertion as true. Magic9mushroom 19:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- 450 RUs may be be disproportionate to the Melnorme Trader's ship value but it still isn't very much in gameplay terms. I don't agree with you, but am satisfied with that section of the Druuge page thanks to Zeracles' edit following yours. --Shiver 06:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I see that Druuge Mauler available in New Alliance Ship fleet data in Super Melee. But Druuge is not the member of the Alliance and they are the member of Crimson Corporation. So why the Druuge ship are in New Alliance Ship in Super Melee? --Videogamer13 06:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)