User talk:Valaggar

Do no modify my user pages, including my to do list. If you think something should be different there, put it on the talk page. — SvdB 02:34, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Hey Val, while I appreciate your enthusiasm, it's not good form to simply blank a page you think should be deleted. While I agree for the most part on those pages, some may not, so it's generally considered polite to put a comment on the talk page - and then wait awhile (like a few days or a week) for people to reply. I've turned the individual star pages into the appropriate redirects, but I'm more hesitant about the constellation pages. As such, I'm reverting those ones back - we can discuss their value and future on their respective talk pages, again giving others a chance to respond. --Fyzixfighter 11:53, 16 June 2007 (CEST)

I apologize for taking action in such a rude manner - I sometimes make such blunders. See my thesis at Category talk:Constellations. Valaggar 13:22, 16 June 2007 (CEST)

I've been editing this wiki for a very long time under various IP addresses without registering a username. I think I'm just fine with anonymous contributions. So no thanks for the whole registration thing. --24.117.122.78 10:54, 26 June 2007 (CEST)

Valaggar, you could probably ask Meep-Eep what his date of birth was and have him tell you. No need to be an internet detective about it. --Shiver 23:03, 19 December 2008 (CET)

Yeah, but it's more fun this way, and he probably wouldn't tell me anyway, based on his edit summaries when he deleted my guesses. Anyway, it seems that my last guess was wrong too (somehow), so I'm just going to creep back to the shadows where I've been lurking for such a long time already. Valaggar 14:35, 20 December 2008 (CET)

Quite stylish indeed! I'd ask what's cooking in the shadows and can I help, but I doubt you'd tell us, masterful lurker that you are. By the way fellas, I haven't abandoned this place, just been doing a little something for the SC1 remake. --Zeracles 18:19, 20 December 2008 (CET)

Uziana.com

I read your reply to the article. Nice. hehehe. --PsiPhi 18:16, 19 October 2007 (CEST)