Difference between revisions of "Talk:*Below*"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(keep this?) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we really keep this as a separate article, and not merely add the information contained herein to the relevant definitions at [[Orz communications]]? After all, we don't have the slightest idea of what *below* is, much less whether it is a dimension or not. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 10:36, 8 December 2007 (CET) | Should we really keep this as a separate article, and not merely add the information contained herein to the relevant definitions at [[Orz communications]]? After all, we don't have the slightest idea of what *below* is, much less whether it is a dimension or not. [[User:Valaggar|Valaggar]] 10:36, 8 December 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mmm, it's subjective, but I would, I guess just because (to me) *below* represents a big enough mystery to have its own article. --[[User:Zeracles|Zeracles]] 03:38, 25 December 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 02:38, 25 December 2007
Should we really keep this as a separate article, and not merely add the information contained herein to the relevant definitions at Orz communications? After all, we don't have the slightest idea of what *below* is, much less whether it is a dimension or not. Valaggar 10:36, 8 December 2007 (CET)
Mmm, it's subjective, but I would, I guess just because (to me) *below* represents a big enough mystery to have its own article. --Zeracles 03:38, 25 December 2007 (CET)