Difference between revisions of "Talk:X-Form"
m (Talk:X-form moved to Talk:X-Form: In-game DOS version name) |
(Talking on a talk page.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Yes, severe damage will be taken, but it comes out better than the naive 'charge' strategy. | Yes, severe damage will be taken, but it comes out better than the naive 'charge' strategy. | ||
- [[User:Death 999|Death 999]] 13:48, 22 Dec 2005 (EST) | - [[User:Death 999|Death 999]] 13:48, 22 Dec 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The names X-Wing and Y-Wing can't possibly be canon. Are they? | ||
| + | --[[User:Shiver|Shiver]] 14:46, 3 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 3 September 2008
If we include strategies here, then this should include a notice on using the Y-form to accelerate into a charge, then coasting in on the X-form, leaving enough time to recover battery.
Also, is it worth pointing out that X-form vs Ilwrath, though a slugfest slanted against the X-form, still has a good strategy and a bad strategy?
That is, a good strategy is for the X-form to ram the Ilwrath with lasers blazing, then use a touch of thrust coming off the bounce to get a good, medium range while moving away from the Ilwrath, yet tempting the Ilwrath to continue its charge. Ideally, the Ilwrath will have to traverse the 'hot spot' at a low relative velocity.
Yes, severe damage will be taken, but it comes out better than the naive 'charge' strategy. - Death 999 13:48, 22 Dec 2005 (EST)
The names X-Wing and Y-Wing can't possibly be canon. Are they?
--Shiver 14:46, 3 September 2008 (CEST)